 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20
09-21-2022, 06:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
yes. in the olden days(pre 2000) I preferred cards with no disfiguring creases in my collection...and trimmed/altered was a no-go.
these days...I've been forced to embrace altered cards as the only responsible way to add cards I want...like this guy! We have seen a major uptick in values/demand for altered/low grade cards as prices on many have skyrocketed out of reach of many. I'm at peace with preferring a reasonably altered card to an ugly card with a #! 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB PSA 1958 Topps HOF'ers - Lower Grades | RayBShotz | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-25-2022 05:23 AM |
| Reduced PSA Lower grades T206 FS | RayBShotz | T206 cards B/S/T | 10 | 04-24-2021 10:06 AM |
| FS: E95's, PSA lower grades, some HOF'ers | Kzoo | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 04-16-2020 07:00 AM |
| WTB: All Cobbs in Lower Grades or Raw | mjsilvey80 | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-17-2018 04:08 PM |
| WTB: All Cobbs in Lower Grades | mjsilvey80 | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 08-16-2017 08:56 AM |
Threaded Mode