![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's one that somebody may have recorded the date of acquisition on:
Paul A. Hines. Outfielder with the Washington Nationals in 1886-1887. 2,133 hits and 57 home runs in 20 MLB seasons. 1884 World Series champion with the Providence Grays. 1878 Triple Crown winner. 2-time (1878 and 1879) batting champion. 1878 NL home run leader and NL RBI leader. Hines debuted with Washington in the National Association in 1972 and played for eight other MLB teams, including the Washington Blue Legs (1873), Washington Nationals (NL) (1886-1887), and, in his final season, the Washington Statesmen (1891). During the first five NL seasons, from 1876 through 1880, Hines had more base hits than any other player, and he retired third to Cap Anson and Jim O'Rourke with 1,884 career hits in the majors. His total of sixteen seasons as a major league team's primary center fielder was not surpassed until Tris Speaker and Ty Cobb in 1925. https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1663758755 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I didn’t have lower grade cards, I wouldn’t have a collection at all. I would rather have the card in hand than spending large amounts of money to have a pristine example of it. It all started when I found a beat to hell Brett rookie at a mall show in the 80’s for $2. I threw the money at the guy and ran out like I had just stole the Mona Lisa. Pretty much the North Star still for how I collect.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
yes. in the olden days(pre 2000) I preferred cards with no disfiguring creases in my collection...and trimmed/altered was a no-go.
these days...I've been forced to embrace altered cards as the only responsible way to add cards I want...like this guy! We have seen a major uptick in values/demand for altered/low grade cards as prices on many have skyrocketed out of reach of many. I'm at peace with preferring a reasonably altered card to an ugly card with a #! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Auth's & 1's give ya a bigger bang for your buck
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
on letter S would keep this card from receiving a number grade, or so I was told by SGC. As such the blue background is a stunner.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here is a bio I did on him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsE3c9DFKr0 As for lower grade cards, I love them as well...
__________________
⚾️ Successful transactions with: npa589, OhioCardCollector, BaseballChuck, J56baseball, Ben Yourg, helfrich91, oldjudge, tlwise12, inceptus, gfgcom, rhodeskenm, Moonlight Graham Last edited by Rad_Hazard; 09-21-2022 at 11:15 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Love the "1's
- |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great cards, Phil and Jeremy! Those two are both on my want list...
![]()
__________________
_ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme, seablaster, twalk, qed2190, Gorditadogg, LuckyLarry, tlhss, Cory |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is a great thread.
I love some of my higher graded cards as they are simply beautiful and you can picture what the cards looked like when they first saw the light. With that said, there is also a beauty to be found with our lower graded cards. These cards are over 100 years old! They shouldn't look like they are fresh from the printer, they should have a story to tell. My lower grade cards have lived a full life. If I ever reach 100 years of age, I will have scars and wrinkles, and they will hopefully have their own, rich story to tell as well. M101-2 Jennings 1 Net54.jpg T206 Cobb (Portrait, Red) 1 Net54.jpgT206 Cobb (Portrait, Red) 2 Net54.jpg T227 Bender 1 Net54.jpgT227 Bender 2 Net54.jpg N172 McVey 1 Net54.jpg
__________________
Successful Net54 transactions with: t206fix x2, Shammus, mybuddyinc x3, FrankWakefield, Brian Van Horn, Jrsox, Vintagetoppsguy, powderfinger, Bocabirdman x2, Baseball*Collectibles, bcbgcbrcb, Vintageismygame, usernamealreadytaken, oldjudge x2, Joshchisox08, rocarroll, Voodoochild, Sebie43 and frankbmd and more... |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In addition to its visible flaws, I'm pretty sure this card is "skinned." But I'm happy to have it because of the strong image of Mack.
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad & blank backs. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking cards of WaJo. Also E222 cards of Lipe, Revelle & Ryan. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB PSA 1958 Topps HOF'ers - Lower Grades | RayBShotz | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-25-2022 05:23 AM |
Reduced PSA Lower grades T206 FS | RayBShotz | T206 cards B/S/T | 10 | 04-24-2021 10:06 AM |
FS: E95's, PSA lower grades, some HOF'ers | Kzoo | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 04-16-2020 07:00 AM |
WTB: All Cobbs in Lower Grades or Raw | mjsilvey80 | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-17-2018 04:08 PM |
WTB: All Cobbs in Lower Grades | mjsilvey80 | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 08-16-2017 08:56 AM |