Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Being forced to enter a contract is not the standard for being able to challenge a provision as unenforceable.
|
What Smarti said!
I didn't think there was anyone forcing someone to enter into a PSA grading service contract. Submitters are given a choice, and make the decision for themselves then. Not sure how someone, even in a California court, could consciously accept the terms and fees under those conditions where they know the cost in advance, and then be able to turn around at a later date and come back and argue they were somehow being overcharged/cheated. Last I looked, there are other TPG services to choose from as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Assuming that is how it works, still a pretty lousy result for the submitter especially given the wait times these days. Closing in on a year and a half on one sub speaking of which.
|
Not sure what wait times have to do with the OP's question though. That is an entirely different topic that has already been addressed in multiple other threads.