![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...gs/7039204002/ In a 2016 blog post, the NRA referred to the AR-15 as "America's most popular rifle" https://web.archive.org/web/20191116...popular-rifle/ It has been reported that there are 20 million AR-15 style rifles in circulation in the USA: https://www.businessinsider.com/us-2...on-2022-5?op=1 Ubiquitous does not mean it is the most popular gun in the country. But it does mean they can be found pretty much everywhere. Last edited by cgjackson222; 07-21-2022 at 02:29 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That was my statement.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 07-21-2022 at 02:39 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It could be that the weapon was just used in virtually all high profile mass shootings, such as ones in schools and ones with particularly high amounts of deaths. I realize there are technically about 1 mass shooting per day or something like. I am sure a lot of those aren't with an AR-15 style weapon. Last edited by cgjackson222; 07-21-2022 at 02:40 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...on-types-used/
These are FBI statistics. They also to not break down the rifle category by scary or that looks like my granddad's, this is all rifles.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 07-21-2022 at 02:46 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But I wonder if there is sort of a copycat situation with shooters in schools. I think they want to look badass, and they think the AR-15 does. I think a lot of them don't know much about guns. Supposedly the Uvalde 18 year old shooter had never shot a gun before. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
These are usually mentally and socially challenged individuals for the most part and looking to cement themselves from a nobody into a media superstar. It's a Warhol effort to gain fame and thanks to the media, it works. It is also fact that 690 people yearly win over a million dollars via lottery and that stat only includes logically people buying tickets. The most biased website available everytown USA (because I am not cherry picking facts) states this - Since 2013 there were at least 943 incidents of gunfire on school grounds, resulting in 321 deaths and 652 injuries nationally. That number would include a large number of suicide and gang instances unrelated to mass shootings of course, but that helps their point and that's what people do. It's a silly argument, but if I look at generally does it make more sense statistically to scare the crap out of kids by putting them in bunkers for infinitesimal chances or to teach them how to handle the more common chance of them winning a million dollars without going bankrupt? Everything is perspective. agreed, it's a silly statement (kinda) but the hyperbole of school shootings daily is also. One dead kid is too many, but chasing resolutions is not that easy of an answer. Your villain will just be replaced with another. An agreeable commonality between all these recent kids is that everyone seemed to see it coming and all signs were ignored. As they were 18 years old, the childhood mental health and police notes do not show on a background check as they were juveniles. Would a more logical first step be addressing the loophole that juvenile records are not included? I can justify that and find ground.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 07-21-2022 at 03:15 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One point of difficulty is that the early reports and media reports are often wrong on the specific facts. Any scary looking long gun with plastic furniture is an AR-15, if the scary looking long gun has wood furniture it is an AK-47, if it is a handgun it is a Glock.
These terms are used because these guns are in common use (and for Glock, I think it largely has to do with the fact it rhymes well and easily in rap lyrics that have pushed into the mainstream), and because the people reporting them do not know anything, on a purely factual level, about firearms. Back when I used to watch the news before giving up on it, it happened frequently that the photographs shown of the incident would not match the news description. Nonetheless, it is likely that the AR-15 is used in a fairly significant amount of mass shootings wherein the criminal uses a long gun (which is a minority of mass shootings, rifles are not suited to stealth or surprise). This is not because it fires special or high-power bullets (it does the opposite). It is possible some people think it looks cool and edgy and that has influenced some. The same could be said of many guns of a similar aesthetic type, but it is possible. It seems to me it is most likely because it is, by far, the most common rifle in America. Honda Civics are involved in tons of accidents, not because they are difficult to steer or they are poorly made but because they are everywhere. Go to the rifle range, and there are probably at least as many AR-15's out on the tables as there are shooters. Half the rifles or more at your local gun store will be an AR-15. The advantages and disadvantages of the AR platform in particular don't really apply much to the type of situation under current discussion. A person shooting at unarmed and defenseless people in a 'gun-free zone' is not particularly helped or hampered by this platform as opposed to dozens of others. DGU's are impossible to count because many are never reported (it's hard for a massacre not to enter the statistics, or a suicide) and most never require discharging the firearm. Even the anti-gun CDC report, commissioned specifically for that purpose, found up to 3.5mm. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by bnorth; 07-21-2022 at 02:50 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
According to the Rockefeller Institute for Government (which I had never heard of before) there are about 20 a year, I think as of 2020. They define a mass shooting an incident of targeted violence carried out by one or more shooters at one or more public or populated locations. Multiple victims (both injuries and fatalities) are associated with the attack, and both the victims and location(s) are chosen either at random or for their symbolic value. The event occurs within a single 24-hour period, though most attacks typically last only a few minutes. The motivation of the shooting must not correlate with gang violence or targeted militant or terroristic activity. https://rockinst.org/gun-violence/ma...ing-factsheet/ But Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit research group that tracks shootings and their characteristics in the United States, defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people, excluding the perpetrator(s), are shot in one location at roughly the same time. If you define it this way, the numbers are much higher: 611 mass shootings in 2020 alone. https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/ |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The listed instances of defensive use should be eye opening to those unfamiliar and that think the news item the other day is somehow an anomaly. Those numbers are verboten to show by many.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB Comiskey (ownership years card) for evolving HOF set. | Misunderestimated | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 01-02-2020 07:50 PM |
One more way to ruin the hobby - fractional ownership | Throttlesteer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 08-14-2019 01:19 PM |
Help determining ownership status of several high profile items | Sean1125 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-29-2015 09:42 AM |
Ownership of old photographs | theantiquetiger | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 08-17-2011 01:43 PM |
Scan Ownership | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-14-2005 12:10 PM |