NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2022, 04:38 PM
Mark17's Avatar
Mark17 Mark17 is offline
M@rk S@tterstr0m
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,230
Default

So much of it is subjective. I think the best we have, historically, is the Gold Glove award. And of course that can't possibly cover all the intangibles.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2022, 05:18 PM
Mike D. Mike D. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: West Greenwich, RI
Posts: 1,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17 View Post
So much of it is subjective. I think the best we have, historically, is the Gold Glove award. And of course that can't possibly cover all the intangibles.
And especially historically, the Gold Glove award is reputational, or often connected with a big offensive season...so it's more of a "guidepost" than a "statistical measure".

It's also a bit dependent on the rest of the league, like Rookie of the Year. You could have an amazing rookie year and NOT win rookie of the year because someone else had a better year. You can win ROY with a very mediocre season because nobody does better.

If there are three great defensive shortstops in one league, and the 4th best just happens to be in the other league...the first and fourth best defensive shortstops win the GG.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2022, 10:13 PM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is online now
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,418
Default

I was always impressed with the way Buster Posey handled so many different types of Giants pitchers over the years.

Three no-hitters are another line on Posey’s impressive resume, which includes a Rookie of the Year Award, MVP, three World Series titles, seven All-Star appearances, five Silver Sluggers, a Gold Glove and a batting title. Cain’s perfect game was the first, and thus far only, in the storied history of the Giants franchise
__________________
Phil Lewis


https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2022, 09:31 AM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,166
Default

MLB has a pitch framing stat and there is a league leader but it doesn't appear on baseball reference:

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/catch...tcher&sort=4,1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2022, 12:19 PM
tschock tschock is offline
T@yl0r $ch0ck
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17 View Post
So much of it is subjective. I think the best we have, historically, is the Gold Glove award. And of course that can't possibly cover all the intangibles.
Definitely subjective, but another way to 'measure' might be how they fare in their post catching career. How good are/were they as managers or coaches?

Catchers generally are the best position players that turn into managers. I believe it has a lot to do with much of the 'unmeasurable' things they need to address during the game. Some is instinctive, some is people skills, some may be related to being the only position that sees the entire field (and maybe has a better 'view' as to how the game is unfolding), and I'm sure a bunch of other 'intangibles' as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2022, 01:45 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tschock View Post
Definitely subjective, but another way to 'measure' might be how they fare in their post catching career. How good are/were they as managers or coaches?

Catchers generally are the best position players that turn into managers. I believe it has a lot to do with much of the 'unmeasurable' things they need to address during the game. Some is instinctive, some is people skills, some may be related to being the only position that sees the entire field (and maybe has a better 'view' as to how the game is unfolding), and I'm sure a bunch of other 'intangibles' as well.
Also, being good managers might have an awful lot to do with maybe knowing how to handle pitchers better than anyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2022, 02:41 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,166
Default

I don't know about that. I can think of two catchers who were pretty poor handlers of pitchers: Joe Torre and Joe Girardi. Notorious for killing arms.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2022, 03:21 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
I don't know about that. I can think of two catchers who were pretty poor handlers of pitchers: Joe Torre and Joe Girardi. Notorious for killing arms.
I meant that more in terms of their egos and moods, etc., since they had to hang out and work directly with pitchers all the time while catching. Not necessarily just about how they handled their pitch selections and pitch counts.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2022, 03:51 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,166
Default

Ah. I would agree with that. They also tend to spend a lot of time in organized ball one or another. Lots of time to soak it in.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-19-2022, 05:23 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
Ah. I would agree with that. They also tend to spend a lot of time in organized ball one or another. Lots of time to soak it in.
Absolutely. And becasue of their interaction with the pitchers, they spend a lot more time watching and analyzing opposing team players and how they bat and so on. I doubt any other position players do anything at all like that.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who had a positive impact on your collection ? Baseballcrazy62 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 151 05-15-2025 07:21 PM
Impact of gumstains on value Brianruns10 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 10 12-09-2019 11:23 AM
Impact of the MC and/or MK designation TheBigRedOne Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 02-27-2017 05:43 AM
Impact of Net 54 on SCP/Sothebys Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 09-15-2007 05:44 PM
Impact of the Card Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 45 07-17-2007 02:17 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 PM.


ebay GSB