![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are you talking about through surface damage or print loss/misprinted? Both would be downgraded by a grader, but there are a bunch of people who like to pay extra for recurring print defects.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just for clarification, the wording wasn't 'rubbed off.' There is simply too much red ink involved and it 'tidal-waved' where the white writing should be. Were the white letters actually rubbed off, there would be damage to the red as well, which isn't the case. It's a printing anomaly.
s-l1600-4.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 03-27-2022 at 03:13 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted Sherman (Republicanmass) recently had/has a card like this that he referred to the back as obliterated.
No idea if that is Ted's own word or if that is a hobby word, however?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just made it up. I think they are cool. Nobody else cares
Well maybe Bishop. ![]()
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Simple answer, it should knock the grade down either way how the grader sees it. It would be a either a PD as a flaw for the over-inking or at minimum a knock for poor registration.
More difficult answer, some of us weirdos are drawn to print errors like this. For the 2% looking for these they may actually pay a premium (more drastic the impact the better). When I see cards like this my recommendation is always to not grade it.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 03-27-2022 at 05:19 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sure doesn't help the grade, but as a print defect, I pay a premium for them.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kimball N184 blank back, rubbed or fake? | jermmcd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-23-2016 08:06 AM |
Writing on Cards | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 02-25-2011 11:45 AM |
Postcard writing...... | asphaltman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-17-2010 11:46 AM |
1951 Magic FB Un-rubbed + 1 | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 0 | 03-07-2009 09:10 AM |
Important info re: eBay completed auction info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-21-2006 07:37 PM |