![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
AJ, hoping to get a different response from a different site?! Keep the Mantle, the massive overwhelming majority of responses are mantle, and here you are getting it from a bunch of prewar peeps!!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Totally fascinated by people's choices between the two cards. Never thought it would be so one sided towards Mantle given how hot the Goudey Ruth's are.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going the other direction and saying Ruth. I get that the '51 Mantle is his rookie, but there are way more '51 Mantles than '33 Ruths. As time goes on, Ruth remains one of the top players of all time (if not #1). Mantle is high up there as well, but Ruth is king. And I want an iconic card of his, from an iconic set.
The Mantle is his rookie, but the '52T obviously is more in demand. Put it to the sniff test - ask 100 people with no baseball knowledge if they've heard of Babe Ruth, and then Mickey Mantle. Guarantee more have heard of the Babe, and that will only increase over time. So long term, give me Ruth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Those 2 particular cards, put me another vote for Mantle. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I dont think people are picking a 51 mantle over a yellow Ruth. Instead, I think people are picking THAT particular Mantle (which is great looking) over that particular Ruth (which is nice bit not exceptional for the grade like the Mantle)
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+2
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/user/JStottlemire1 I just love collecting, trading and enjoying the hobby. I PC and enjoy pre war iconic cards. I enjoy anything Cobb, Jackson, Ruth and Robinson. Currently working and prioritizing Jackie Robinson Bond Bread set. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+4
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which card? Imagine yourself having one or the other...which ever one makes you the happiest is the right card. The Mantle does have really nice centering.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is where I'm at. I personally have no real desire to own any Mantles, but that one is stunning and I'd rather have it than the Ruth.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This! Wow, that Mantle looks like an "8". Insane! Keeper for sure!
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree with everyone who said Mantle.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mantle all day
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Super sharp cards. Tough call - I think I'd prefer the Ruth, but I would want to see as clear of a pic on the Ruth as I see the Mantle. Gosh that's a toughie!
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If both cards were centered with excellent color and registration all things being equal. Which do you choose?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally, I'd still go with Mantle. But if it was Mantle or #144 Ruth, then Ruth.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m a Ruth guy. The mantle is awesome. However the Ruth is a blurry screenshot photo, we can’t accurately assess how nice this particular Ruth is I’d say.
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others currently working on: E101 (33/50) T3 set (104/104), complete! T205 set (108/221) '33 Goudey collecting W600s, Walter Johnson Last edited by chadeast; 11-09-2021 at 09:36 AM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
now this is a hypothetical?
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding… Yep!
__________________
Tony A. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony if both were equal (centering, registration, color etc) which one you go with?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In this case though since the Mick is so damn nice, Mick wins in my opinion.
__________________
Tony A. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a feeling that the Ruth is much nicer than that blurry image conveys.
Brian (My pick no matter what is Ruth...because if Mickey had a 1933 Goudey issued it would have pictured him as a two year old). |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S 2x 1971 TOPPS #14 DAVE CONCEPCION RC CARD A CARD IS VG-EX B CARD IS EX-MT | megalimey | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2019 07:55 AM |
Diff. in value between index card vs. gover.post card 1940-1960 players | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 03-09-2019 04:50 AM |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |
Ruth-Gehrig card, near mint, in Gary Engel's Japanese card auction. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-28-2002 06:33 PM |