![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I dont think people are picking a 51 mantle over a yellow Ruth. Instead, I think people are picking THAT particular Mantle (which is great looking) over that particular Ruth (which is nice bit not exceptional for the grade like the Mantle)
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+2
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/user/JStottlemire1 I just love collecting, trading and enjoying the hobby. I PC and enjoy pre war iconic cards. I enjoy anything Cobb, Jackson, Ruth and Robinson. Currently working and prioritizing Jackie Robinson Bond Bread set. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+4
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which card? Imagine yourself having one or the other...which ever one makes you the happiest is the right card. The Mantle does have really nice centering.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is where I'm at. I personally have no real desire to own any Mantles, but that one is stunning and I'd rather have it than the Ruth.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This! Wow, that Mantle looks like an "8". Insane! Keeper for sure!
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree with everyone who said Mantle.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mantle all day
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Super sharp cards. Tough call - I think I'd prefer the Ruth, but I would want to see as clear of a pic on the Ruth as I see the Mantle. Gosh that's a toughie!
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A.J. This is a tough one for me--I love Goudey Ruth's, but also a Mantle guy---I would go with the Mick--it is a beautiful card, great centering and presentation, card has it all---Ruth is nice--but the Mantle wins---You should have kept Mickey and bought the Ruth---
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In any event, talk about a huge trade possibility! I miss the good ole days trading cards in my old neighborhood
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If both cards were centered with excellent color and registration all things being equal. Which do you choose?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally, I'd still go with Mantle. But if it was Mantle or #144 Ruth, then Ruth.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m a Ruth guy. The mantle is awesome. However the Ruth is a blurry screenshot photo, we can’t accurately assess how nice this particular Ruth is I’d say.
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others currently working on: E101 (33/50) T3 set (104/104), complete! T205 set (108/221) '33 Goudey collecting W600s, Walter Johnson Last edited by chadeast; 11-09-2021 at 09:36 AM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mantle is much nicer, but Ruth is Ruth
Ruth
__________________
My wantlist http://www.oldbaseball.com/wantlists...tag=bdonaldson Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
now this is a hypothetical?
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding… Yep!
__________________
Tony A. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony if both were equal (centering, registration, color etc) which one you go with?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In this case though since the Mick is so damn nice, Mick wins in my opinion.
__________________
Tony A. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a feeling that the Ruth is much nicer than that blurry image conveys.
Brian (My pick no matter what is Ruth...because if Mickey had a 1933 Goudey issued it would have pictured him as a two year old). |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also taking that Mantle all day long, and I'm a Ruth guy too.
That Mantle is a prime example of not all 4s being equal. If you were to list that Mantle at auction, it likely outsells most 5s (unless they also happen to have the same eye appeal for the grade). |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But Regardless good choice and good "problem" to have. Cannot go wrong either way.
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S 2x 1971 TOPPS #14 DAVE CONCEPCION RC CARD A CARD IS VG-EX B CARD IS EX-MT | megalimey | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2019 07:55 AM |
Diff. in value between index card vs. gover.post card 1940-1960 players | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 03-09-2019 04:50 AM |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |
Ruth-Gehrig card, near mint, in Gary Engel's Japanese card auction. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-28-2002 06:33 PM |