![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is one of the worst looking Goudey Ruth 144s I have seen. And after juice it's already over 30k? Maybe it's a registry thing because I wouldn't pay 5k for it unless it was to flip. I couldn't own it and look at it everyday. My last one wasn't quite up to snuff so I upgraded and it looked tons better than this 7, it was a 4. That is one ugly card to me. From their write up-
" GEM MINT reverse and pin point sharp corners give this example a 9/10 in the eye appeal department in our view." Whomever "our" is certainly isn't a collector. Because of the sharp corners and great looking back I would give it a 2, at best. As for the Wagner. Ugh..... what the heck? I agree they should return the make up they put on him. I honestly think I liked it better unrestored. It looks fake now., .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-15-2021 at 07:23 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Restored T206 Wagner? | Jobu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-10-2020 07:16 AM |
H. WAGNER, RESTORED or TAMPERED WITH? | pepis | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-21-2013 12:26 AM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
Would the Wagner had sold for more had it not been restored? | martyogelvie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-26-2010 10:10 AM |
December auctions - T206 Honus Wagner cards PSA 4 and PSA 1 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-17-2004 05:49 PM |