PWCC contract with SGC cancelled???

[Johnny630]

To me PSA is Arrogant enough to not honor SGC grades. Don’t put it past them.

God I hope this doesn’t happens, Dave Keep The Company Please.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

To me PSA is Arrogant enough to not honor SGC grades. Don’t put it past them.

God I hope this doesn’t happens, Dave Keep The Company Please.

But they make up for it by honoring their own when confronted with proof of alteration.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

But they make up for it by honoring their own when confronted with proof of alteration.

Neither of them do that.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by steve B

Neither of them do that.

Perhaps I wasn't clear but we have certainly seen PSA reaffirm its grade on cards outed by BODA.

[whiteymet]

I go back to my original post that started this thread.

Why would PWCC tell a consignor that PSA was buying SGC and that PWCC's contract with SGC was being cancelled?

Is there an ulterior motive PWCC would have to tell a consignor this story that Nat is denying?

[Johnny630]

Originally Posted by whiteymet

I go back to my original post that started this thread.

Why would PWCC tell a consignor that PSA was buying SGC and that PWCC's contract with SGC was being cancelled?

Is there an ulterior motive PWCC would have to tell a consignor this story that Nat is denying?

Probably Spoke Out of Place When he Shouldn’t have. A story usually always changes a little from each person it’s passed down to.

[chalupacollects]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

Probably Spoke Out of Place When he Shouldn’t have. A story usually always changes a little from each person it’s passed down to.

Maybe PWCC is not having s good time with PSA lately and is looking to shake the tree a bit???

[notfast]

Originally Posted by whiteymet

I go back to my original post that started this thread.

Why would PWCC tell a consignor that PSA was buying SGC and that PWCC's contract with SGC was being cancelled?

Is there an ulterior motive PWCC would have to tell a consignor this story that Nat is denying?

Maybe the actual info was lost in translation between the 5+ people it went through before being posted here.

[whiteymet]

Originally Posted by notfast

Maybe the actual info was lost in translation between the 5+ people it went through before being posted here.

FWIW I spoke again to my friend who is the one who spoke to PWCC. So first of all not 5 + people did this go through, just once removed from the conversation.

He was getting ready to send cards to PWCC to be graded and listed on ebay when a PWCC employee named Aaron Hanan (Maybe some here know him) informed him that PWCC lost it's contract with SGC to have cards graded by them. The reason given was that PSA was buying SGC as I first reported.

Thus my friend did not send his cards to PWCC.

I don't think there can be much if anything "lost in translation" here. I don't mean to put out false information, rather I am just repeating information I received from my friend that I just reconfirmed today.

Maybe PWCC has some reason for telling my friend this, but I have no idea what that could be.

Will be interested to see the outcome of all of this.

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Perhaps I wasn't clear but we have certainly seen PSA reaffirm its grade on cards outed by BODA.

BGS has done it a couple of times last year as well.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Perhaps I wasn't clear but we have certainly seen PSA reaffirm its grade on cards outed by BODA.

I meant that neither company backs up any sort of guarantee. Even if they're completely wrong.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by steve B

I meant that neither company backs up any sort of guarantee. Even if they're completely wrong.

SGC no longer even has one.