PWCC contract with SGC cancelled???

[notfast]

Originally Posted by whiteymet

I go back to my original post that started this thread.

Why would PWCC tell a consignor that PSA was buying SGC and that PWCC's contract with SGC was being cancelled?

Is there an ulterior motive PWCC would have to tell a consignor this story that Nat is denying?

Maybe the actual info was lost in translation between the 5+ people it went through before being posted here.

[whiteymet]

Originally Posted by notfast

Maybe the actual info was lost in translation between the 5+ people it went through before being posted here.

FWIW I spoke again to my friend who is the one who spoke to PWCC. So first of all not 5 + people did this go through, just once removed from the conversation.

He was getting ready to send cards to PWCC to be graded and listed on ebay when a PWCC employee named Aaron Hanan (Maybe some here know him) informed him that PWCC lost it's contract with SGC to have cards graded by them. The reason given was that PSA was buying SGC as I first reported.

Thus my friend did not send his cards to PWCC.

I don't think there can be much if anything "lost in translation" here. I don't mean to put out false information, rather I am just repeating information I received from my friend that I just reconfirmed today.

Maybe PWCC has some reason for telling my friend this, but I have no idea what that could be.

Will be interested to see the outcome of all of this.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by whiteymet

FWIW I spoke again to my friend who is the one who spoke to PWCC. So first of all not 5 + people did this go through, just once removed from the conversation.

He was getting ready to send cards to PWCC to be graded and listed on ebay when a PWCC employee named Aaron Hanan (Maybe some here know him) informed him that PWCC lost it's contract with SGC to have cards graded by them. The reason given was that PSA was buying SGC as I first reported.

Thus my friend did not send his cards to PWCC.

I don't think there can be much if anything "lost in translation" here. I don't mean to put out false information, rather I am just repeating information I received from my friend that I just reconfirmed today.

Maybe PWCC has some reason for telling my friend this, but I have no idea what that could be.

Will be interested to see the outcome of all of this.

A more believable reason would be due to their history of submitting altered cards in my opinion.

[Johnny630]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

A more believable reason would be due to their history of submitting altered cards in my opinion.

Boom I didn’t wanna say it but you said it perfectly.

As I’ve said before the guy spoke out of place not the gentleman’s friend the guy he spoke to at pwcc.

[darwinbulldog]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

A more believable reason would be due to their history of submitting altered cards in my opinion.

Hope so.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

A more believable reason would be due to their history of submitting altered cards in my opinion.

So after years of knowing what PWCC is and does, Dave suddenly cuts them off? That doesn't make sense to me.

[Republicaninmass]

I'm curious to see if the tin foil hat crowd has some substance here.

[Johnny630]

It’s Not Happening I commend SGC for standing strong and keeping their company!