NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2021, 04:29 PM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belfast1933 View Post
Thx for sharing...

So, why would AI grading be such a bad idea? It’s still a “buy the card, not the case” opportunity but I’d think technology could help to objectively measure corners, color brightness, centering, detect trimming, etc

Curious why technology would NOT be better than what we have now?
It would clearly be better. The eye appeal point is, frankly, stupid. That's the one thing we definitely don't need third party graders to tell us.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2021, 04:50 PM
Santo10Fan's Avatar
Santo10Fan Santo10Fan is offline
Ben
ben tay/lor
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 702
Default

Maybe it's good for the new generation to learn condition all on their own. Who knows??
__________________
BZT

Last edited by Santo10Fan; 04-15-2021 at 04:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2021, 05:28 PM
jcc6252's Avatar
jcc6252 jcc6252 is offline
J1m C0chran
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 467
Default Thanks Danny

According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2021, 05:32 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcc6252 View Post
According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.
maybe they're not so unpredictable with their "best" customers?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2021, 05:36 PM
Johnny630 Johnny630 is offline
Johnny MaZilli
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ullmandds View Post
maybe they're not so unpredictable with their "best" customers?

boom
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2021, 05:49 PM
perezfan's Avatar
perezfan perezfan is offline
M@RK ST€!NBERG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,440
Default

ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.

Bad reporting as well. Not even a mention of the alteration scandal, and the hobby's real need for AI technology. Quoting PWCC, Probstein and PSA as reputable sources doesn't add to their credibility either.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:09 PM
DanP's Avatar
DanP DanP is offline
Dan Paradis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southington, CT
Posts: 946
Default Espn

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.

Bad reporting as well. Not even a mention of the alteration scandal, and the hobby's real need for AI technology. Quoting PWCC, Probstein and PSA as reputable sources doesn't add to their credibility either.
+1 , haven’t watched them in years and don’t plan on it in the future.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2021, 11:24 AM
Chris-Counts's Avatar
Chris-Counts Chris-Counts is offline
Chris Counts
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,876
Default

I agree. Every time MLB goes political, I figure out new and creative ways how to not give them my money.

As for ESPN, they shredded their credibility long ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.

Bad reporting as well. Not even a mention of the alteration scandal, and the hobby's real need for AI technology. Quoting PWCC, Probstein and PSA as reputable sources doesn't add to their credibility either.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-16-2021, 12:27 PM
ASF123 ASF123 is offline
Andrew
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Chicago
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.
To this post and the others like it above: Do you guys not see any irony in gratuitously throwing a political "stick to sports" jab in a thread that has nothing to do with politics, about an article that has nothing to do with politics?

Last edited by ASF123; 04-16-2021 at 12:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2021, 01:49 PM
Marchillo Marchillo is offline
St3phen M@rchillo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.

Bad reporting as well. Not even a mention of the alteration scandal, and the hobby's real need for AI technology. Quoting PWCC, Probstein and PSA as reputable sources doesn't add to their credibility either.
Same here - I will suffer through ESPN when one of my teams is on (a few times per year) - but my days of sports center, espn.com etc are long long over.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-16-2021, 07:33 PM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political. The last thing I want to watch is "agendized" sports.

Bad reporting as well. Not even a mention of the alteration scandal, and the hobby's real need for AI technology. Quoting PWCC, Probstein and PSA as reputable sources doesn't add to their credibility either.
God every post you make just makes me think you are more of an asshole than the last one did. Their level of ignorance, arrogance and just plain folly is staggering. And nobody can beat a dead horse like you can.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-16-2021, 07:50 PM
BobbyStrawberry's Avatar
BobbyStrawberry BobbyStrawberry is offline
mªttHǝɯ h0uℊℌ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan View Post
ESPN sucks. I turned them off the second they felt the need to make every aspect of sports political.
I completely agree that ESPN sucks, but I don't understand what you mean by the second sentence. How do they make "every aspect of sports political"?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-15-2021, 05:52 PM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcc6252 View Post
According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.
Maybe it's a .96 correlation? That wouldn't be so tough if they're submitting a lot of lower condition vintage cards. Or maybe it's just 96% are within 1.5 points or something like that.

Last edited by darwinbulldog; 04-15-2021 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-15-2021, 06:05 PM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog View Post
Maybe it's a .96 correlation? That wouldn't be so tough if they're submitting a lot of lower condition vintage cards. Or maybe it's just 96% are within 1.5 points or something like that.
I think they are only sending in ultra modern. Maybe he means that 96% of the cards are 9 or 10 and 4% are 8.5 or less. No way they are getting 96% exactly right.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2021, 06:24 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
I think they are only sending in ultra modern. Maybe he means that 96% of the cards are 9 or 10 and 4% are 8.5 or less. No way they are getting 96% exactly right.
I bet I could predict a 4sc sub with 100 percent accurancy.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:02 PM
vthobby vthobby is offline
Mike P.ap
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: VT
Posts: 2,425
Default What $300 gets you......

PSA logged my card on 4/13/21 and the grade popped today 4/15/21.

I think my card jumped 10 million other cards including all of Bradley Crenshaws submissions! lol

Peace, Mike
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-16-2021, 10:57 AM
drcy's Avatar
drcy drcy is offline
David Ru.dd Cycl.eback
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcc6252 View Post
According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.
Yes, I agree. The variation in grading appears to be higher than 4%
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-16-2021, 03:40 PM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcc6252 View Post
According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.
Yep. Has to be bullshit when a 9 is equal to a 10 especially with modern era cards.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ESPN Article on the Burdick Collection Rich Klein Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 23 05-26-2013 10:56 AM
Nice hobby article on ESPN.com mjkm90 Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 3 12-26-2012 02:08 PM
Interesting article on ESPN tcdyess Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 02-03-2012 07:44 PM
Nice article on ESPN about our hobby BobbyVCP Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 08-05-2009 07:14 PM
New Pre-War HOFers? ESPN.com Article Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 108 08-27-2008 10:58 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM.


ebay GSB