ESPN Article on PSA

[darwinbulldog]

Originally Posted by jcc6252

According to the article, "Crenshaw's company has a 96% accuracy rate on predicting what Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) would grade a card."

I call BS. We all know PSA is all over the place with their assigned grades, and with their new, inexperienced workforce, the grading is no doubt even more unpredictable. I would be surprised if they hit 80%.

Maybe it's a .96 correlation? That wouldn't be so tough if they're submitting a lot of lower condition vintage cards. Or maybe it's just 96% are within 1.5 points or something like that.

[rats60]

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog

Maybe it's a .96 correlation? That wouldn't be so tough if they're submitting a lot of lower condition vintage cards. Or maybe it's just 96% are within 1.5 points or something like that.

I think they are only sending in ultra modern. Maybe he means that 96% of the cards are 9 or 10 and 4% are 8.5 or less. No way they are getting 96% exactly right.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by rats60

I think they are only sending in ultra modern. Maybe he means that 96% of the cards are 9 or 10 and 4% are 8.5 or less. No way they are getting 96% exactly right.

I bet I could predict a 4sc sub with 100 percent accurancy.

[vthobby]

PSA logged my card on 4/13/21 and the grade popped today 4/15/21.

I think my card jumped 10 million other cards including all of Bradley Crenshaws submissions! lol

Peace, Mike

[toledo_mudhen]

Originally Posted by vtgmsc

PSA logged my card on 4/13/21 and the grade popped today 4/15/21.

I think my card jumped 10 million other cards including all of Bradley Crenshaws submissions! lol

Peace, Mike

Mike - What is the card that you were willing to shell out $300 on for grading fee?

Did it receive the grade that you had anticipated?