FS: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 4.5

[dariushou]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

Lawsuit? Create a go fund me page, I will kick in significantly.

I second this. I'm sure others will, too.

[swarmee]

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1457965

Interesting that PSA is now cracking down on cards previously submitted through them that they have visual evidence of being graded before. Wonder if this is only for serial numbered cards, and currently only certain grading levels are getting scanned by PSA.
Nat Turner has also responded to a thread or two on Blowout calling out PSA for doing their customers wrong, however, he has smartly stayed out of any thread having to do with their inability or complicity in the altered cards scandal.

[Peter_Spaeth]

He understands that the vast majority of the hobby doesn't care.

If they say it isn't trimmed, it isn't trimmed. Even if it is.

If I say it's safe to surf this beach, it's safe to surf this beach.

Ipse dixit or whatever the figure of speech is.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by swarmee

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1457965

Interesting that PSA is now cracking down on cards previously submitted through them that they have visual evidence of being graded before. Wonder if this is only for serial numbered cards, and currently only certain grading levels are getting scanned by PSA.
Nat Turner has also responded to a thread or two on Blowout calling out PSA for doing their customers wrong, however, he has smartly stayed out of any thread having to do with their inability or complicity in the altered cards scandal.

To me this denial despite being shown before and after is enough to push them over the line into complicit.

But they'll skate on this like they do with everything, because all that matters is "value added"

SGC is the same.

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by steve B

To me this denial despite being shown before and after is enough to push them over the line into complicit.

But they'll skate on this like they do with everything, because all that matters is "value added"

SGC is the same.

Excellent point. Even though we've long suspected PSA's complicity and favoritism towards "preferred" customers.... This is now hard evidence that they not only misidentified an altered card, but also shunned iron-clad evidence that the card is altered.

At a bare minimum, they are in violation of their so called "guarantee". More accurately however, this categorizes them as purveyors of fraud.

I know there are thousands of similar corrupt instances, but really hope the FBI is all over this particular one (as the stakes are far higher with this case).