![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Coming soon, MGC - Mordor Grading Company (They applied for "Sauron Grading Company," but realized it would've been a conflict) with their all-seeing grading eye...
sauron.jpg (Oh, nice card!!!)
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 03-26-2021 at 03:30 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
did you crack and resubmit or review?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is crazy...wow. Either way, SUPER nice card. Good eye. I constantly see graded cards where I can't believe they have the grade...both ways. Just goes to show...
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congrats. Card looks great.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't want to say the members name in case I get it wrong, but he had a PSA 2 receive a bump to a 6, and maybe even one grade higher, IIRC?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1. Different companies have different rules for grading
2. The rules change over time (pinholes, 'the card would never get that grade today', etc) 3. Even with the same rules, different graders will apply them differently. 4. Even with the same rules and the same grader, the same card may get a different grade when submitted at different times. 5. There are an infinite number and severity of flaws that have to be evaluated for a given grade. 6. There is a financial incentive for a grading company to encourage collectors to re-submit cards hoping for a bump. What if a company had enough confidence in issuing a grade that they would not regrade a card? 7. And finally, don't forget the conspiracy theory that a grade may, just may, be dependent on the name of the person/company that submits it. Does anyone really expect consistency out of a process like this? By the way, that is a very nice Mantle. His last, really classic card. Congratulations on a great acquisition.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) Last edited by Bigdaddy; 03-27-2021 at 06:24 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Awesome bump 👏 I’m actually zero for like 10+ with bumps. Cracking out has been the only way that worked for me. One time I cracked a psa 4 Namath RC and accidentally dented the card, it came back a 6. Without the dent it could have gotten a 8 or better I swear.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Crack and resub. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice, i would say 6.5 is the correct grade
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I bought a beautiful PSA 2 1954 Sal Maglie, cracked it out, send it in, got a 7. It makes no sense...
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It doesn't. My bump at this point was all for naught, as SGC upon closer examination sent that card back in a slab with a defective gasket that had pieces of plastic shard sticking out near the corners. I cracked it again this weekend. I have no plans to sell, so as long as the card is unscathed it's fine - but just a huge disappointing experience all the way around with SGC - especially after I got that grade. I gave them hell on Friday and they were mildly apologetic, but did not offer to refund my grading fees. They just lost my business for a good long while, if not forever.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 03-29-2021 at 10:16 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The TPG giveth, and the TPG taketh away.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please Bump | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 01-02-2020 08:44 AM |
bump | hedgefund96 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 07-20-2018 03:12 PM |
Best way to get PSA bump | reversek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 04-14-2017 05:43 PM |
Should I go for a bump? | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 04-07-2017 05:54 PM |
What is Bump | 39special | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-26-2011 10:48 PM |