FS: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 4.5

[Peter_Spaeth]

SMR is useless but the PSA website showing auction prices is a good resource, similar to VCP.

[Johnny630]

What is the "Marketplace" (I thought that was PWCC)

Who Determines the Definition of "THE MARKETPLACE"

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

What is the "Marketplace" (I thought that was PWCC)

Who Determines the Definition of "THE MARKETPLACE"

I assume it's a reference to recent auction sales, as on their website.

[Johnny630]

Any updates AJ ??????

[ajjohnsonsoxfan]

I promised to provide an update and just heard back from PSA today.

I sent the card via prepaid fedex to Jackie who informed me that she gave the card blind to their head grader (no knowledge of the evidence provided in the blowout link). The grader measured the card and looked for evidence of trim or alteration and found none. Jackie then gave the grader the link to the evidence which she said was reviewed by the grader. Upon 2nd inspection by the same grader, Jackie informs me that they still didn't find evidence of alteration or trimming and are standing by the 4.5 grade. They validated the cert # and took scans for their records. As is PSA practice, Jackie tells me they don't give written acknowledgment of the review but she says my account will reflect the review (which I have provided here).

I have no plans to sell the card in the immediate future, but the question I think now is that I'll need to include the "story" of the card to whomever might someday purchase and let them decide.

[Bicem]

So PSA can't detect trimming even when shown said trimming.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Man. Not surprised, I guess, but it sure seemed a clear cut case. Meet the new boss. (riff) Same as the old boss. (riff)

AJ, I don't suppose you know if Reza reviewed it?

[Exhibitman]

Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan

the question I think now is that I'll need to include the "story" of the card to whomever might someday purchase and let them decide.

That would be appropriate. Do unto others and whatnot. I bet you'd still realize full price on it.

[perezfan]

By being in complete denial (and trying to limit their own liability), PSA continues to create a huge credibility problem for the hobby.

Sure, AJ can sell the card with full disclosure. Very commendable on his part.

But what about the next seller. And how about the seller after that? At what point does the card change hands without any proper disclosure? There is absolutely no doubt that this altered card will remain in circulation with zero disclosure at some point in time. Someone will ultimately get burned for many thousands of dollars.

A huge disservice to the hobby, courtesy of PSA. The fact that they can ignore obvious "before and after" evidence doesn't surprise me in the least. But it is still a self-serving and bitter disappointment.

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan

but the question I think now is that I'll need to include the "story" of the card to whomever might someday purchase and let them decide.

Lawsuit? Create a go fund me page, I will kick in significantly.

[hcv123]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

Lawsuit? Create a go fund me page, I will kick in significantly.

To force a clearly necessary independent opinionwhich at best I imagine would prove that they "got it wrong" - I imagine it would be much harder to prove it was done as a perpetration of fraud to limit their liability. Any attorneys care to chime in?

This is the equivalent of asking the Fox with wool around his mouth if he ate the sheep he was guarding and taking his word for it when he responds no!

[benjulmag]

No surprise to me at least that PSA would not accept evidence of trimming by Blowout. What would be the implications if they did? IMO PSA's contingent liabilities grossly exceed their net worth given the amount of altered cards that have received grades. The problem is proving that such as to be legally able to invoke their guarantee. So if PSA were to concede that evidence of trimming by Blowout in and of itself requires it to make good on their guarantee, that concession could have significant adverse financial consequences.

EDITED TO ADD that regardless what Blowout did or did not find, the notion that a company will objectively evaluate whether it needs to make good on a guarantee is unrealistic. The entire concept behind the legitimacy of TPG is based on the principle that the grading company has no economic stake in the outcome. So we are to believe that a TPG will objectively evaluate that it made a mistake, the consequences of which will be to trigger a significant financial liability? Your Kool-Aid better be pretty strong to swallow that one.

[dariushou]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

Lawsuit? Create a go fund me page, I will kick in significantly.

I second this. I'm sure others will, too.

[jad22]

Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan

I promised to provide an update and just heard back from PSA today.

I sent the card via prepaid fedex to Jackie who informed me that she gave the card blind to their head grader (no knowledge of the evidence provided in the blowout link). The grader measured the card and looked for evidence of trim or alteration and found none. Jackie then gave the grader the link to the evidence which she said was reviewed by the grader. Upon 2nd inspection by the same grader, Jackie informs me that they still didn't find evidence of alteration or trimming and are standing by the 4.5 grade. They validated the cert # and took scans for their records. As is PSA practice, Jackie tells me they don't give written acknowledgment of the review but she says my account will reflect the review (which I have provided here).

I have no plans to sell the card in the immediate future, but the question I think now is that I'll need to include the "story" of the card to whomever might someday purchase and let them decide.

You should crack it out and resubmit under another name it and see if it comes back as trimmed.