![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I get that most posting on this subject is making a statement through their actions. If that is the case then look into your TPG's (PSA comes to mind) do you stop buying anything PSA graded? Because of the potential issues surrounding their business?
Let's not be hypocritical here. Pointing fingers can't stop at one source. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I will agree it's a bit of a double-edged sword and less than an ideal situation.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-08-2020 at 06:35 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
John, I totally agree with what you're saying.
My main point was that PWCC, PSA, SGC, Heritage, uncle Rick etc etc. are all in the middle serving our community. You also throw in sketchy shill bid collectors/card doctors then you have a collective bunch who are in this together. Just want to make it clear in my honest opinion there is no one source to blame. To hate on a particular entity within the community is like hating on the community as a whole. It's a cyclical hobby and we are all in it together. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In fact, I think we have a duty to hate on those particular entities that are problematic- at least call them out and talk about them. This is how we self police and help the vast majority of good folks. Ryan Hotchkiss |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah Martin, I would disagree. PSA has had shady elements to its business practices for decades now in terms of who gets what grades, what cards may or may not be altered, consistency of grading over time, the list goes on and on. But the hobby as a whole did not hard check them enough over this most recent episode to make a difference, other than a bunch of the usual complaining. There's a conflict of interest here in theory for most of us - we suspect skulduggery on some level with a grader, but most of us have slabs with nice cards from said grader that would be worth less and perhaps even substantially less if indeed that grader's reputation is noticeably harmed. So we don't do it.
I don't know if that means we can't continue to call out individual bad actors and things that we know are wrong. For PSA before 2018, there is a lot of speculation, but not a ton of absolute proof in terms of wrongdoing. (That is if you don't consider the case of the very first card they ever graded - which was known to be altered at the time, and was slabbed as not being that way regardless). If we are being positive and not criticizing the community as a whole, sure I would like to see PSA "improve" - but I think you do this via a free market and giving them more competition. Place more emphasis on correct authentication and the subtleties of alteration than simply focusing on the difference between a PSA 9 and 10, perhaps. But again, there would have to be a market demand to do this - and if the past 2 years for PWCC and PSA are any indication - a few people here on message boards that are actually card geeks and not just flip worshippers have not been nearly enough to do that.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-08-2020 at 01:28 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unfortunately for some I think this is true. I have a modest collection I keep at home and fiddle with more or less every day (moreso since COVID and working from home, probably). Some dudes spend thousands regularly on single slabs and stock their bank safety deposit boxes, never seeing the cards after they are purchased. That may be "investment", but it's not a hobby. I'll take the latter.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-08-2020 at 02:22 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry, did not mean to pigeonhole anyone. Yes clearly, there are also quite informed collectors that enjoy the hobby who store valuable cards somewhere other than their home. What I meant was at least in some cases, I get the idea that some people do this purely as an investment, and don't really know / care anything about cards. You do not sound like one of those people. I should clarify to say of course there is nothing wrong with that. Each unto their own.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-10-2020 at 10:15 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I consign and buy from PWCC consistently. There are some of us that have been around long enough that can easily tell a trimmed or doctored card in a TPG holder. I don't buy those. I buy bargains! Plenty to be had when you really look.
Peace, Mike |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PWCC I want to bid but.... I just can't! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 12-21-2017 05:23 PM |
pwcc | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 280 | 02-17-2017 09:14 PM |
Pwcc? | Manny Trillo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 09-23-2016 06:14 AM |
Really, PWCC? | Bliggity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 09-06-2016 07:49 PM |
Pwcc | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 04-12-2016 06:29 PM |