|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The stripe is definitely light blue. In fact, it seems to be just a tad darker than the light blue in the body of the checklist.
Here's #518 stuck above the #517 in question. The colors are not a match... 517518comparison.jpg My reason for wondering if "White Sox" versions of the checklist could have also appeared in the 7th series is because the card above could possibly (but most likely doubtfully) be the #526 Twins team. if you look towards the left (of the original pic, not the one posted here), there is blue over there too, matching the setup of the team cards and the rookie cards with the angled color stripe. Was there a team card in blue in the 6th series, and/or is there a different card that has a blue 'nameplate' and also a blue stripe (or whatever) on the upper left side?? If there's a 'blue' rookies card in the 6th series, than that's probably it, right? This crap is fascinating!!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The #518 Braves Rookies is the only team or rookies card from #447-522 with a similar color, all of the other team and rookies cards in that series are colors nowhere even close.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 08-29-2020 at 09:46 PM. Reason: Missed a word |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's more food for thought...that adds even more wrinkles to the problem. The checklist has the red/magenta plate very much misaligned, so it's possible that the light blue stripe on the card above it could very well supposed to be violet/purple (or perhaps a different color?), but the red is missing (and would have been printed above the blue sliver that is visible). There's no way to know if the blue we see is as it's supposed to be, or if it is missing a part of its color makeup. This logical hole keeps getting deeper.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
One other thing of note. If you examine the blue sliver above the checklist, it is undoubtedly much thinner than the width (or is it height since the card is sideways??) of the team nameplates, so I have no problem concluding it is a rookies card up there...whether ultimately blue, violet/purple, or something else.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 08-29-2020 at 10:11 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm suggesting that instead of referring to the checklist as W. Sox or White Sox, that we refer to it as Cards or Cardinals.
Interesting to note that both the White Sox and Cardinals finished with the same W/L record in 1966 - 83/79. Ok, something to add to the thread - if you look at the number 518 above closely, you can see that the right (bottom) side of the nameplate has a slight blue tint while the left side (top) has a more red tint. This could correspond to a slight shift of the red ink (we've seen that before) to the left (top) of the card. And given the strong shift of red in the #517 checklist, you could see where that purple nameplate would appear light blue. Am I crazy? NVM, don't answer that.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-54) 1954 Bowman (-2) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) Last edited by Bigdaddy; 08-29-2020 at 11:14 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's why I believe 525 is in the row C (Hoerner) below 561 (which is in Perranowski row).
1966_561_Bell.jpg |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Found this miscut on #586 today. Any ideas which card might be below it?
1966_586_Bottom.JPG 1966_586_bottom_back.jpg |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also found this. Any suggestions as to what card might be at left? The cards that are still not placed are: 528, 532 (but this has 552 on its right), 538, 541, 552, 556, 566, 569 (but I suspect it can't be this card), 570, 576, 586, 590.
1966_517_MC.jpg |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
The miscut to the checklist left cannot be 586 (now above 583) or 532 (left of 552).
I am also surprised that the cards above and/or below the checklist haven't been identified as it would seem that a miscut would clearly show the complete yellow (front) or the carmine (?) back. And since the checklist is in column 11, most of the possibilities of the top/bottom card above it are rookie cards. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering if this might be above Tigers team, #583??
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am referring to the Raymond card miscut, #586.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-15-2024 at 06:50 AM. Reason: . |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
It really surprises me the W. Sox and Cards rookies checklist does not sell for a big premium compared to the other 7th series checklist. Especially considering its location in the G. Jackson row.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1985 Topps Baseball Uncut Sheet w/ Puckett RC * 1987 Uncut Sheets in Box | mintacular | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-20-2017 02:22 PM |
| Topps uncut sheets | mybestbretts | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 7 | 11-26-2014 01:30 PM |
| 1972 Topps uncut partial sheets | SAllen2556 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-07-2014 12:50 PM |
| 1955 Topps uncut sheets | chadeast | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 06-22-2012 09:52 AM |
| 1952-60 Uncut Topps Sheets | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-07-2008 03:46 PM |