1966 Topps High's - Any uncut sheets or partial sheets known?

[BillP]

thx, I think the 598 583 569 can go in next to bell and 595 below 598 next time you update.

thx for this graphic.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by BillP

thx, I think the 598 583 569 can go in next to bell and 595 below 598 next time you update.

thx for this graphic.

If those are definite, LMK and I'll add them right now.

[Kevvyg1026]

I believe you should merge the two images into one. The one headed by Northrup goes on top, then the image leading with Roggenburk etc goes at the bottom of the other image. That row with Roggenburk is the tail end of the Taylor row.

Such a mosh up would represent the first eight rows of one of the slits. The pattern Northrup, Perranowsi, Hoerner, Taylor, Salmon, Northrup, Mantilla, Shirley is accurate.

There are also miscuts that support Row B, headed by Perranowski, being under Row G, headed by Shirley. And there are miscuts that show some cards from the Salmon row are at bottom of the sheet.

So, one slit is pretty much guaranteed to look like (leading card given): Northrup, Perranowski, Hoerner, Taylor, Salmon, Northrup, Mantilla, Shirley, Perrnowski, Hoerner, Taylor, Salmon.

[Kevvyg1026]

Here's a miscut of the 7th series checklist which shows that it is at the edge of a sheet. Hence,it must be at the end of either row B (Perranowski), row C (Hoerner), or row G (Shirley).

1966_517_edge.jpg

[stlcardsfan]

If there is one thing I have learned here is that my set is incomplete. On a mission for W, Sox checklist.

[BillP]

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Here's a miscut of the 7th series checklist which shows that it is at the edge of a sheet. Hence,it must be at the end of either row B (Perranowski), row C (Hoerner), or row G (Shirley).

Attachment 415079

thats the one i'm thinking of picking up.

[JollyElm]

LMK if this looks right...



The two original graphics that were merged to create this one have been saved, so they're still on hand if we need to revert to them for some reason.

[Kevvyg1026]

Looks great. Thank you.

Could you make a version, as yet not fully confirmed, with 595 & 523 in the two open spots in the Taylor row, and 598, 583, & 569 in columns 6, 7, 8 of the Hoerner row?