![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This card is actually accurately graded as per original standards has nice appeal, only last two years did PSA & SGC not figure "wrinkles" as a 4, a crease always was a 3 especially if the surface was broken but this card is better than a 3 and unless you specifically asked if there were wrinkles or hidden defects, the seller did nothing wrong, of course if your not happy, return the card as you have the right to do that as per e bay, and the seller has to accept this....I do understand how you feel this way as the wrinkles are evident in your scan.
. Last edited by painthistorian; 05-22-2020 at 08:47 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by moeson; 05-23-2020 at 10:28 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Grading | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-30-2016 08:13 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
GAI Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-03-2006 06:33 PM |
PRO Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-17-2006 11:04 AM |