![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes, PSA graded the card and I disagree with their assessment on this one. For me, a description of a card is not solely based on the grade of the slab or its photo, having an accompanying description serves as a guide to better evaluate whether or not to purchase it. Had I seen "wrinkles" in the description, I would have passed and waited for another one to appear. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This card is actually accurately graded as per original standards has nice appeal, only last two years did PSA & SGC not figure "wrinkles" as a 4, a crease always was a 3 especially if the surface was broken but this card is better than a 3 and unless you specifically asked if there were wrinkles or hidden defects, the seller did nothing wrong, of course if your not happy, return the card as you have the right to do that as per e bay, and the seller has to accept this....I do understand how you feel this way as the wrinkles are evident in your scan.
. Last edited by painthistorian; 05-22-2020 at 08:47 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by moeson; 05-23-2020 at 10:28 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
These opinions that it's so normal, accurate, and expected for a 4 to possibly have that level of damage are honestly baffling. Especially for a card that's already going to lose ground from its centering/bottom right conrner Last edited by cardsagain74; 05-22-2020 at 09:19 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I realize that grading is very subjective, even when there are more or less guidelines that have been established. Right now I have a Kretlow with perfect centering and a nice image; its flaw is that it has a minuscule paper wrinkle on the top right of the card. It was advertised as vg/ex by the seller I purchased it from and though I'm tempted to keep it as it looks great I am trying to have a wrinkle and crease-free mid-grade set. I will advertise it as vg/ex because there is damage to the card as light as it is. I was hoping this Berra would be a keeper, but I guess I'll have to keep searching and hope I run across another vg/ex to excellent condition card at the price I paid for this copy. Thank you for the feedback from both sides of the equation. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The seller accepts returns. If you are unhappy with the grade, return it. I think the card is over graded and the scans don’t really show the creasing. I would have noted the damage in my description as I try to avoid any condition miscommunication issues that would lead to returns and would insure the buyer is happy with their purchase.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Grading | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-30-2016 08:13 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
GAI Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-03-2006 06:33 PM |
PRO Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-17-2006 11:04 AM |