t206 Lajoie Error Found - Anything Similar Known to Exist?

[RedsFan1941]

i think the 1.5 grade more than makes up for not having a description of the overprint

[chuckw]

Did not ask for added description but they authenticate that the card and overprint are authentic, which wasn't a concern since they were in an attic for decades.

[MVSNYC]

Originally Posted by RedsFan1941

i think the 1.5 grade more than makes up for not having a description of the overprint

I respectfully disagree.

In the world of freaks/errors. Having the variation noted on the flip has always been very important to the people collecting them (ask Johhny V, Jamie, Wonka [wherever he may be], Scott & Hank, etc)...and the "AUTH" designation usually has gone hand in hand with that, and more desirable, as it typically denotes a true "scrap" that wasn't put into packs. (Where's Johnny V?, he can wax poetry about all this).

I can't speak to whether or not SGC has stopped doing that, but I can tell you that I was the first person to get them to start doing it around 10 years ago. I had a discussion with Dave Foreman and others at SGC at a show; I had several printing errors with me (missing color, upside down back, multi-strike, etc). They told me they had never added those descriptors before, but they thought it was fine to start doing it, thus mine were the very first ones they did it with.

(Incidentally, I like this card a lot...no issue there).

[Leon]

Yeap.
You know more than I do about the subject, Mike. But that has been my observation too. Not long ago I sold an extreme miscut (2 almost half cards on front) and it had several punch holes and creases. It sold quickly for a pretty penny. It will be interesting to see where this one goes this Sunday ast auction...

Originally Posted by MVSNYC

I respectfully disagree.

In the world of freaks/errors. Having the variation noted on the flip has always been very important to the people collecting them (ask Johhny V, Jamie, Wonka [wherever he may be], Scott & Hank, etc)...and the "AUTH" designation usually has gone hand in hand with that, and more desirable, as it typically denotes a true "scrap" that wasn't put into packs. (Where's Johnny V?, he can wax poetry about all this).

I can't speak to whether or not SGC has stopped doing that, but I can tell you that I was the first person to get them to start doing it around 10 years ago. I had a discussion with Dave Foreman and others at SGC at a show; I had several printing errors with me (missing color, upside down back, multi-strike, etc). They told me they had never added those descriptors before, but they thought it was fine to start doing it, thus mine were the very first ones they did it with.

(Incidentally, I like this card a lot...no issue there).

[irishdenny]

Originally Posted by MVSNYC

I respectfully disagree.

In the world of freaks/errors. Having the variation noted on the flip has always been very important to the people collecting them ...

Yep!!!

"Watchya Tink bout these Grades wit No Mention of the Obvious!?"

[sb1]

SGC no longer puts various anomalies on the flip.

[RedsFan1941]

things must have changed since mcsnyc talked to them. maybe he could talk to them again.

[Rhotchkiss]

See this one, where PSA put both the brown old mill and the 649 OP on the flip. SGC should do this too.

[chriskim]

That famous Brown OM OP card used to be owned by Hall. It is very obvious why it got captionon the label. LOL
I think the Lajoie error and that brown OM OP are somehow related but I just couldnt figured out how. Both 649 OP were printed about the same place.