Does PSA regrade automatically if you go for a reholder?

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by glynparson

A reholder and a review are two completely different services.

That's too bad. Because they could've killed 2 birds with one stone on this one...

* Is the centering really indicative of a "7"?

* This is an odd looking 1973 Topps Card. Maybe it's just my eyes that are going bad?

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by perezfan

That's too bad. Because they could've killed 2 birds with one stone on this one...

* Is the centering really indicative of a "7"?

* This is an odd looking 1973 Topps Card. Maybe it's just my eyes that are going bad?

Weirdly looks just like a 1969 Topps. I am sure it is some kind of special edition because as we all know PSA is always correct.

I am more than a little weird and have a small collection of flip errors. I believe they fix those for free.

I have seen much worse centering on PSA 7s of the 1969 Topps Clemente card.

[glynparson]

In a case like this which is a data entry error i believe they redo it for free including shipping and to me that is more oc than a 7 should be. Do you have a peak can you measure its exact centering at worst point? Or it could have had the flip switched with the card above or below it in order did you check those certs was one a 1969 Clemente? I had this happen on at206 order about 6-7 years ago. They are human after all i don't get bent out of shape on those types of things. Far worse stuff to worry about.

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by glynparson

In a case like this which is a data entry error i believe they redo it for free including shipping and to me that is more oc than a 7 should be. Do you have a peak can you measure its exact centering at worst point? Or it could have had the flip switched with the card above or below it in order did you check those certs was one a 1969 Clemente? I had this happen on at206 order about 6-7 years ago. They are human after all i don't get bent out of shape on those types of things. Far worse stuff to worry about.

Yup, no doubt there's far worse stuff to worry about. This one just struck my funny bone.

[darwinbulldog]

Definitely looks better than 75-25 to me. Maybe you're thinking of Beckett's grading standards.

[steve B]

Wouldn't re-grade mean they had done some actual grading in the past?

[Republicaninmass]

BUT if you ask for a review, I believe they will reholder

[Goudey77]

Originally Posted by perezfan

* This is an odd looking 1973 Topps Card. Maybe it's just my eyes that are going bad?

That's obviously a 1969 Topps buyback issued in 1973 packs.