![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If someone defaced my card you can bet that I would be pretty annoyed. An altered card is always accepted by the hobby when graded authentic. There is no reason to guess a person's motivation and deface their card.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
But wait. Then they wouldn't get resubmitted. [Uproarious laughter from fat cats at the PSA boardroom table]
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Talking with someone about that Sotheby's restorer woman, I offered the opinion that all restored/conserved items should be permanently marked, but that she would likely (and perhaps rightly) say she wouldn't have the right to mark someone else's item,
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
There has to be a better solution | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-20-2013 07:53 PM |
A possible solution for the PSA 8 T206 Wagner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 149 | 10-24-2012 12:34 PM |
The solution to all of these threads- altering? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-01-2006 06:06 AM |
solution to ethical problems? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-17-2005 12:38 PM |
Pop-Up Ads---A solution | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-28-2002 10:11 AM |