|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't they Authenticate a whole bunch of fake autos on T206 .
Not so clean. JohnP |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
But when they found out, they stopped authenticating auto's. Do you thin PSA will stop authenticating Cards?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
SGC also bumped some of Gary’s biggest profits with the 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson’s... they definitely have a lower quantity discovered thus far, but they aren’t really any better.
Last edited by BLongley; 06-21-2019 at 01:16 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I mean, they can't be exactly equally bad, but it's not definitive from the absolute numbers of grading errors revealed to date that PSAs batting average with the doctored cards is worse than SGCs. I would guess it is, but it wouldn't surprise me either way. Certainly PSA has had vastly more plate appearances. That could be because Moser/Brent knew the cards had a better chance of getting through there, but PSA would also give them a better ROI even if they figured the cards had the same chance of getting through with SGC as with PSA.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
65k bump on a 1914 Joe Jackson just posted as well
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Given the price disparity in the holders, I am wondering if they go to SGC only for cards PSA has actually caught and rejected?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to think so. But then again, they bought cards from their OWN auctions, altered them, and resold through their OWN auctions. Guess they thought people wouldn't catch on
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
So should we ALL go back to the old days when we graded our own cards?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
People like this sometimes have a misplaced sense of their own invulnerability.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-23-2019 at 08:41 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also nobody submits to PSA anymore or will wait in line due to all of these major problems.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 06-24-2019 at 09:52 AM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
no, but they are so bad at it or corrupt that they should. Very piss poor company.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do we include PSA/DNA with PSA's incompetence? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
If we are paying for a service that isn't being accurately provided why wouldn't we hold them accountable? If PSA, SGC, or anyone else can't tell the difference between a real or forged signature that's just as bad as being unable to distinguish between an altered or unaltered card.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unless there are reports that PSA and PWCC haven’t been refunding clients, I don’t believe F and D respectively is appropriate. I could be wrong though.
Last edited by jhs5120; 06-21-2019 at 03:46 PM. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And how many people have said PWCC refunded them? One guy maybe, or two? Again, with all the nonsense they've pulled off for years, the burden is on them to show their good faith in my eyes. And it wouldn't even be good faith, really, more like desperation.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-21-2019 at 04:01 PM. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Funny but on a serious note on the flip side of the altered card stuff there are lots of those sorts of errors in grading as well, that is, perfectly fine cards that get rejected. The consequences are not as serious, but it can be bad news for people trying to earn money selling cards.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-21-2019 at 06:52 PM. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't really think we disagree, although I do think it's fair to include incompetence in one area with another. Both issues are relevant and important.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Historical Figures Mocking the Current Card Scandal | perezfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-14-2019 06:58 PM |
| Help with 1967 Ice Bowl Participants. Looking to get signatures as part of a persona | skelly | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-01-2019 10:48 PM |
| Hobby history: The fake-card scandal of 1972 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-13-2017 12:51 PM |
| It's turning into a cottage industry..... | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-26-2014 12:47 PM |
| There's new grading terminology in the industry..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-20-2009 03:37 PM |