![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: What percentage of PSA 10s have been doctored? | |||
0-10% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 26.72% |
11-30% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 22.14% |
31-50% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 11.45% |
51-70% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 16.79% |
71-90% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 9.92% |
91% or more |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 12.98% |
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Delete and try a second poll, and try Pre-WWII cards
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everyone who participates in this poll, myself included, is guessing as nobody has any concrete evidence whatsoever. But we are all free to guess...I guess.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Consider restarting the poll. Seems as if people are voting for different time periods. Could use a little more clarity IMO.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did repost the poll.
It got 4 votes and then disappeared. No clue why.
__________________
__________________ Looking for 1923 W572 Walt Barbare and Pat Duncan. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I went with the 71-90% option.
I guess it depends on what you call altering. I would say that is accurate in both vintage and modern. Lower end on vintage and higher end on modern. For vintage i just don't remember ever seeing cards from the 50s-70's that looked that(PSA 10) nice in the 1980s. Especially those super bright white borders. On modern, those cards get a little prep work before they go to the graders. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Worth noting that the BO/Moser/PWCC/PSA vintage cards I've been seeing average about a PSA 5 after doctoring. Maybe we were already skeptical enough of the 10s but need to be more cautious about everything else.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are we really getting into this now? How in the Hell can anyone project this? OVERKILL
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess your right Barry, my guess anyway, sorry, couldn't resist........This is a crazy post because there's no way to really determine it...
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 06-01-2019 at 05:26 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would make more sense to do this by issue. Obviously T206s and CJs and E93s are more likely to be trimmed than W600s and postcards.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why do you assume this jeff? As hot as postcards have been?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think high grade PCs are as valued relative to lower grade by collectors as high grade baseball cards are to lower graded cards. Oftentimes a perfect fronted PC will have been postally used and it's rendered a 1 when it would otherwise by a 5-6. Plus trimmed PCs are easier to spot due to the fact that they rarely have fat white borders. If you trim a PC, you end up losing some of the pictured front usually or some of the writing on the back.
![]()
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 06-01-2019 at 08:42 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poll: is Mariano Rivera one of the top 10 pitchers of all time? | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 143 | 01-31-2019 09:46 AM |
Final Poll!! Vote of the all time worst Topps produced set | almostdone | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 22 | 07-28-2015 07:55 PM |
What if you check your psa cards and they're doctored??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-07-2007 04:44 PM |
Cy wins! Time for a new poll? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-28-2006 09:12 PM |
Yet another doctored fake M101 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-23-2005 11:16 PM |