![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally...I agree with the idea that there should be a higher standard for assuring a card has been unaltered...similar to what David and Scott did with my no name t206 a few years ago.
-min size requirements -"quality" of edges/corners/color/sheen of trimmed edge vs untrimmed edge. -fiber appearance/quality where trim was done -added corners should be easy to detect -added color should be easy to detect -provenance Obviously PSA is unable to detect most alterations...and just because of this it shouldn't be accepted in the hobby that this is ok! Whether or not the hobby changes to accept alterations/restorations/"conservations" as ok...THERE NEEDS TO BE DISCLOSURE!!!!!!! WITH NO DISCLOSURE THIS IS NOT OK!!!!! |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Show your conservation/restoration projects | aquarius31 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 30 | 04-21-2020 08:26 PM |
Addiction defined | Edward | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-25-2018 07:40 AM |
History of Cuban Baseball Book and Paper conservation question | Jason19th | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 05-03-2009 03:07 PM |
Card Alteration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-10-2006 06:49 PM |
Question about card alteration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-24-2006 05:12 AM |