![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is that the case? If whatever was added to the card has been removed such that there is no remaining trace, why should going forward the card continue to be regarded as altered? Or is the comment meant to mean that as a practical matter, it is impossible to so completely remove what was added that there will always remain traces?
Last edited by benjulmag; 02-19-2019 at 06:10 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner | mintacular | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 05-04-2010 12:05 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner at HOF | Steve D | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-17-2010 10:00 AM |
Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 03:32 AM |
t206 honus wagner psa 2 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 22 | 05-26-2007 05:22 AM |