![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If PWCC's scan is all but hiding that significant mark in the upper right quadrant that's pretty worrisome.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Could just be the scanner setting making everything look different but I believe the card has also been cleaned rather than just resubmitted.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Much of the difference is likely due to different settings in the scan. If you look at some minute details like the small dark spot on matty's left elbow it becomes apparent that the differences in vibrancy/color are not likely the result of a cleaning. If they were, why would a small dark spot on matty's left elbow point (typical for this card) appear after a cleaning? The scans produced a dark rendering in the sgc 6 holder. As for the spot in the upper blue quadrant, it is possible that this was residue on the card that sgc removed before putting it in the new holder if that was requested by the customer.
Upshot is different settings likely caused the majority of differences in the image of the card, and whether or not it has been cleaned is inconclusive. Why this is PWCC High End is the biggest surprise to me? It's a questionable 6 given the top left corner and has some surface and centering issues that impact the eye appeal of the card. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why a high end 6? Maybe Brent bought it? Either way it certainly devalues their label of high end. I think this is just another bad mistake by the experts at PWCC.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() read the fine print.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 09-03-2018 at 02:36 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like the Ruth caramel sgc 3.5 HE....sure if centering doesnt factor in
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why are people buying into a high end sticker for cards that aren’t high end? I would have respect for it if it actually was legit. It’s really poor form on PWCCs part. I hope the board hears from Brett or Betsy in regards to the t206 Matty high end with stock loss on the upper left corner. I am sure there’s a great explanation for this.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PWCC I want to bid but.... I just can't! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 12-21-2017 05:23 PM |
Pwcc Help | cardsnstuff | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-19-2017 07:15 PM |
pwcc | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 280 | 02-17-2017 09:14 PM |
Really, PWCC? | Bliggity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 09-06-2016 07:49 PM |
Pwcc | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 04-12-2016 06:29 PM |