![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry man this is not true. I'm dialed into quite a few big facebook groups for modern and the modern guys LOVE BGS over PSA. The collective thinking is that it's much harder to cross PSA 10's over to BGS 9.5's (or 10's) so the grading must be better and for modern the sub grades are crucial to help differentiate. I noticed this big time at the Natty where a good 75% of all modern cards I saw were BGS vs. PSA.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Obviously a search by 2018 PSA and 2018 BGS on EBAY isn't perfect but it produces an interesting result. A lot of key word spamming happens and more so with people from other grading companies using PSA so certainly not to be taken at 100% but clearly suggesting that with new cards PSA is very much in the hunt. Perhaps winning in submissions. It is obviously no secret with older cards PSA has a near monopoly on fresh cards being submitted so a huge difference in market share. A few months back I was reading about wait times with BGS and saw that as a potentially healthy sign for overall grading submissions but this is clearly a capital issue and really egregious to sit on customers money for a year and climbing. Not good.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...8+psa&_sacat=0 https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...8+bgs&_sacat=0 Last edited by Dpeck100; 08-29-2018 at 03:37 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
PS from what I know guys buy 9.5s (quads mostly) to try to cross them to PSA 10s. Not the other way around.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-29-2018 at 03:45 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't pretend to know where his cards go long term but for the moment Trout is as hot as any athlete can get. One thing is for sure he has to perform for a long time to sustain these levels! Last edited by Dpeck100; 08-29-2018 at 03:43 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with that irrespective of the grading company involved. But for purposes of this thread, I am confident that on the major issues a PSA 10 is going to outsell a BGS 9.5 even a quad.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I am obviously a PSA supporter and I made a conscious decision early on that longer term there was no other choice. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just looked on PWCC's pricing website at recent 2011 Trout Update PSA 10s and BGS 9.5s. Good barometer because there are lots of both. PSA outselling BGS by 20 percent or so across the board from a quick look. Disparity probably higher on the variations.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-29-2018 at 04:53 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would compare prices on BGS 10 to PSA 10, not sure BGS 9.5 to PSA 10 is an apples to apples comparison. In your Trout comparison BGS 10 VCP avg is $1457 vs. PSA 10 $572 (almost 3x). I was referring more to the overall total numbers of modern in BGS holders and the desirability. From everything I've seen BGS holds substantial leads in both. Which probably has something to do with the long wait times for their lowest tier service.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 08-29-2018 at 05:28 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Turnaround Time. | NaplesGeezer | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 03-24-2018 05:30 PM |
Kudos to PSA Turnaround Time | Joe Hunter | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 13 | 01-06-2018 10:54 PM |
Best/Worst comm.rates +turnaround time major houses | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 05-27-2017 12:49 PM |
PSA turnaround time faster than ever ! | Mickey Mays | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 03-19-2017 02:37 PM |
JSA turnaround time | mark evans | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 09-17-2012 03:40 PM |