Nash on Spence thoughts?

[hcv123]

I don't trust.

I can count on 2 hands the number of signed items in my collection - most are because I wanted the item and it happened to be signed. Nash clearly has some huge "integrity" issues. That said Spence (and other authenticators) likely does as well. To each their own - caveat emptor.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by hcv123

I don't trust.

I can count on 2 hands the number of signed items in my collection - most are because I wanted the item and it happened to be signed. Nash clearly has some huge "integrity" issues. That said Spence (and other authenticators) likely does as well. To each their own - caveat emptor.

I don't disagree with that. The only way I could ever collect autos is on very official docs or in person ones..

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by Leon

I don't disagree with that. The only way I could ever collect autos is on very official docs or in person ones..

I understand your feeling that way. I generally stick with handwritten letters or the few players whose signatures I know well. It's very limiting, but I only enjoy those items that I can look at without questioning my purchase. Having a modern Mantle or Williams, for me is like having a PSA 9 T206. It has to leave the house as soon as possible because of the angst it causes me.