|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Both SGC & PSA are great, PSA because of their Registry gets more for post-war, but I see little difference in pre-war prices. Holders are both solid, although I hate the PSA floating card one. I lean a bit towards SGC from a lot of what’s been said in the thread of their accuracy and communications, but can’t go wrong with either.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my experience, 19th century SGC sells for as much as or more than PSA. By the time you get to Goudey, PSA is more. So somewhere in between the line is crossed where PSA is more. Don't know if it's T206 or not because I've seen it go both ways with T206.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA for value
SGC for looks Nearly my entire collection is SGC. I am a collector and have pretty rare items where the PSA pops are low or non-existent. I also like the people at SGC, though the turn around times the last few years have been quite terrible on my submissions. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA versus SGC | CardMD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 56 | 08-07-2019 02:33 AM |
| GAI grades versus PSA/SGC | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 09-17-2015 02:05 PM |
| poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 09:38 PM |
| Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 10:47 AM |
| 1954 SI Versus Reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2002 02:19 PM |