 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
04-22-2018, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I think most people on this thread are in agreement with what most people are saying. When I'm buying cards I don't care what holders they are in SGC/PSA/BVG. Im buying the card and use grade as a guide not the primary reason I am buying that card. I use SGC to grade cards I'm submitting for all the reasons I stated above. But if I had any real high end cards I was planning on selling (ie PSA 9 Mantle) it's PSA all the way.
But the cards I have range under $250. I think the ROI people are talking about applies to my collection as well so I'll go with SGC. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA versus SGC | CardMD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 56 | 08-07-2019 01:33 AM |
| GAI grades versus PSA/SGC | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 09-17-2015 01:05 PM |
| poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 08:38 PM |
| Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 09:47 AM |
| 1954 SI Versus Reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2002 01:19 PM |
Threaded Mode