![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not all people collect graded cards. Your MINSIZ card is probably worth what 80% of what a regular sized raw card is worth, to collectors looking to complete sets. Many raw collectors don't pull out calipers to determine whether cards meet 2.5x3.5 or whatever the real size is.
The ALTERED one could be for the erasure, if PSA thinks it also damaged the surface of the card. Marks or erasures could also get MK qualifiers. Did you request "No Qualifiers"? If so, maybe they weren't willing to downgrade it from a MK. Again, a raw card collector probably wouldn't care as much as someone working on a registry set. I think the 10% of VG-EX raw estimate above is way low. Maybe 30-50%, but it is true that it depends on how rare the card is.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading Question | Jenx34 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-26-2017 07:13 AM |
Grading Question | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-27-2011 11:29 AM |
SGC Grading Question | e107collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-30-2010 08:03 PM |
E93 Question Value & Grading | bace | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-28-2009 04:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |