![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i'd PM Kevin Mize...he can surely justify the grade for you.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() LMFAO Pete!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well, it is friday!!!!!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
stains or no stains...it is a very very weak card for that grade.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that was my card and all it got from PSA was a 4, I would crack it out and send it to Lucky Larry for grading.
![]() ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed!!!
__________________
****Southern League**** Old Mill (SL) PSA 3: 3/48 Old Mill (SL) PSA 4: 5/48 Hindu Brown: 1/34 ****NY Highlanders Team Set**** Basic Team Set: 13/28 Master Team Set: 13/315 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Card is overgraded, they do exist just as under graded cards do. thats what happens when humans authenticate and/or grade millions and millions of items, mistakes get made.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL!
That card could have any one of 3 qualifiers - ST, MC, OC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's an old flip. It wouldn't get that grade today.
__________________
Successful transactions with: greenmonster66, jfkheat. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It reminds me of one particular dealer in the late '90's/early 2000's who made a practice of opening the slabs, taking out the legitimately graded card, and replacing it with one of an inferior nature. That having been said, a "4" for that example is really a stretch and should have been so regardless of the time period in which it was graded.
Larry |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SGC would probably give it a grade of 60...
![]() Last edited by CMIZ5290; 11-17-2017 at 03:00 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is an absolutely absurd PSA 4 which makes me doubt PSA altogether. My Red Cobb PSA 4 looks 100x nicer.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So PSA grades more harshly today than say, 10 years ago? As such, do PSA graded cards in newer slabs command a premium as the grade is considered more accurate?
__________________
****Southern League**** Old Mill (SL) PSA 3: 3/48 Old Mill (SL) PSA 4: 5/48 Hindu Brown: 1/34 ****NY Highlanders Team Set**** Basic Team Set: 13/28 Master Team Set: 13/315 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tobacco stains on Polar Bear cards are acceptable as well are chunks of tobacco.
PSA got the grade right based on the overall condition of the card. Regardless of what PSA says, the condition of the card is VG-EX all day long. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree on this...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, there are many examples of newer graded cards selling at the high end of the spectrum compared to older graded cards. Some of it has to do with the grading adjustments, but some also has to do with the new tamper-evident cases. So it's not just the grade, it's the generation of flip (hologram or lighthouse) and the slab itself people are paying a premium for with a newly graded example.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|