1952 Topps Pete Reiser Gray Back on Ebay

[Marckus99]

Neither of those are actual gray backs.
But good for those who get taken by the flip.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Marckus99

Neither of those are actual gray backs.
But good for those who get taken by the flip.

Hilarious

Trying to throw people off the scent!

[irv]

Originally Posted by Marckus99

Neither of those are actual gray backs.
But good for those who get taken by the flip.

It's funny you say that as I was also thinking the same thing, but due to my lack of knowledge/experience, and the fact I have never seen one in hand, I just assumed the flip was likely correct?

In my opinion, the front looks more grey than the back, but maybe that is a known fact and has been seen before or it could be the scan?

When I first seen it, I thought I have cards, even outside of the #131-190 series/range that look more grey than that, but I assume it has been proven, beyond a reasonable doubt that greys only exist within that, #131-#190 range?

(E-Bay Reiser and some of my backs)

[casebusters]

I ended the listings so I can relist them with the "gray back" in the title..
so they go back up tonight at the same time they were listed for before.

[Republicaninmass]

Good thing because nobody noticed

[Bestdj777]

.

[casebusters]

Originally Posted by Bestdj777

Do it have a gray back though? If not, you may want to list it accurately instead.

It do.
That's what psa says it is...

[Bestdj777]

Delete.

[swarmee]

The winner has the ability to have PSA review it and if PSA deemed it a regular back, it would be subject to their insured guarantee to downgrade the card and reimburse the owner the difference.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Bestdj777

The question was whether it has a gray back. It definitely doesn't look like it from the pictures. PSA messes up variations pretty frequently, so what they say isn't really a deciding factor.

I've owned quite a few gray backs and have seen psa make 2 mistakes labeling them wrong.

#130 Sheldon Jones labeled gray back (wrong series)

#189 reiser sold in REAa few years back mislabeled as a gray back.


Are they any other examples of mislabeked grays to support your claim

[Brianruns10]

Originally Posted by Bestdj777

The question was whether it has a gray back. It definitely doesn't look like it from the pictures. PSA messes up variations pretty frequently, so what they say isn't really a deciding factor.

It looks fine to me, and the obverse has the characteristic faded yellow look. I'd have no problem bidding on this.