|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought of posting that one as well but the 58 was such a no-brainer.
But I agree the photo of Brooks is fine, it's the coloring that hurts it. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Come to think of it the RJ rookie has a similar feel. Not quite as bad but Reggies looking kinda rough.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Speaking of Reg, I have hated this shot since I first opened a pack and saw it in 1973. Man, that is some toothless old man looking ugliness happening there…
s-l1600-15.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ugly (IMO) Ruth | w7imel | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 20 | 08-19-2014 11:36 PM |
| More Popular: 71 or 75 BB | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 11-08-2013 10:34 PM |
| and the ugly | Matthew80 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 12-16-2012 09:17 PM |
| Popular set, but... WHY!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-10-2007 12:07 AM |
| They`re Ugly I Know, But...... | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2005 06:28 PM |