 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
04-28-2017, 11:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm with Mike. There are definitely some T206s that were factory-cut short. A lot of Old Mills are short. But, I'm skeptical about high grade cards that look short. I'm less concerned about lower grade cards that look short. Just because with the high grade card, there is a very obvious incentive for someone to have trimmed it in order to deceive a buyer. Also, I prefer the look of cards with normal or larger borders. I'd personally rather have a nice 4 with big borders than a PSA 7 with tiny borders (convenient for me since I can't afford a PSA 7 anyway
 )
__________________
ThatT206Life.com 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Size Variation of 1953 Bowman Color | Wichita | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-20-2011 11:25 AM |
| t206 size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-20-2006 03:42 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 09:48 AM |
| How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-21-2002 05:01 PM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 08:40 PM |
Threaded Mode