 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
04-10-2017, 05:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm hoping this brick was not recessed. Otherwise that could put surface impressions in your card. I would kind of expect a 92 SGC 8.5 for this card, if the top right corner has the feathering it sort of looks like to me, and the nick on the top left side is just a scratch on the screwdown.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vintage and PSA's grading consistency over time | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 04-18-2016 08:47 PM |
| How on-time are grading companies? | granite75 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2014 07:39 AM |
| First time SGC submitter question. | Mrvintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-17-2013 08:24 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| first time I have seen this grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-07-2003 08:20 PM |
Threaded Mode