![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I would not worry about the altered stock because it is such a thin card to begin with. That is more for regular cards that have been smashed for several years(decades). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it'll be just fine. Probably not a 9 but fine anyway. I've sent a few in in toploaders which they also don't like, since I don't use cardsavers and have to save them up from stuff I bought. Didn't have a problem, and didn't get the toploaders back. Not a big deal since they were also used ones with old price stickers, yellowing etc.
I didn't send any in in the toploader/mylar sleeve combo, as the mylar had sealed itself to the toploaders and I had to cut the card out. Figured that would really bug them as it was a lot of extra work. Steve B |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm hoping this brick was not recessed. Otherwise that could put surface impressions in your card. I would kind of expect a 92 SGC 8.5 for this card, if the top right corner has the feathering it sort of looks like to me, and the nick on the top left side is just a scratch on the screwdown.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You might get one (92) but odds aren't in your favor. Cross your fingers.
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-11-2017 at 10:22 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm hoping you're wrong but I'm sure you are more experienced with grading than I am so you're probably right. I do think the card looks sharper and better in person than what shows on the scan though.
Last edited by TobaccoKing4; 04-11-2017 at 01:13 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let us know, it should be interesting. I am hoping you are correct. They do give out high grades but they seem to be to others and not me!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the future, STAY AWAY FROM BRICKS!!! I understand you want to keep the card protected, but they make Card Savers in all various sizes.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ended up only getting a 60. While I'm not surprised that it didn't get a 92, I do think it was graded a bit on the low side. There is a little ink mark on the back of the card so maybe that dragged it down?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage and PSA's grading consistency over time | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 04-18-2016 08:47 PM |
How on-time are grading companies? | granite75 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2014 07:39 AM |
First time SGC submitter question. | Mrvintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-17-2013 08:24 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
first time I have seen this grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-07-2003 08:20 PM |