![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Gehrig Foxx Brouthers Pujols Bagwell?? Jeff Bagwell was better than: Greenberg, Frank Thomas, Jim Thome, McCovey, Bill Terry, Johnny Mize, Eddie Murray, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire, Cap Anson? Or mostly-1B like Killebrew, Banks, Miggy, or Carew? Looks to me like he's barely in the top-5 of his own era, and that's only if you like him over McGwire and don't count Miggy. Sorry, he's in the marginal-HOF tier, with Perez, Cepeda, Mattingly, and Hodges. Last edited by earlywynnfan; 01-19-2017 at 07:48 PM. Reason: finish thought |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What makes him better than Thomas, Murray, Cabrera, Terry, or Banks?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I tend to think of Banks as a shortstop and Cabrera who played multiple positions. I would call Thomas the better hitter, Bagwell the better player. Bagwell was very valuable and terrific all around.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would put him below Greenberg and Mize who lost prime years to the war. Also, he is below Cabrera. That puts him 10th. IRod is only behind Bench and Berra, also Josh Gibson if we are including Negros Leaguers which you didn't with Bagwell.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It feels pretty strange for someone to lump Roger Connors and Dan Brouthers with Albert Pujols or Miguel Cabrera. I guess you're looking at numbers or WAR or something but there's no way they stay on any list in the modern game.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Brouthers did some pretty remarkable stuff in his day.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have reason to think Rodriguez juiced and therefore don't rank him.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VCP-like auction tracker for modern | peterose4hof | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 02-05-2013 09:50 PM |
Vintage Card Tracker | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-06-2003 12:11 PM |