The End of Hauls of Shame

[ullmandds]

[QUOTE=Leon;1618712] About a third of the stuff is actually true, a third of it is grossly exaggerated and a third of it is total fabrication. Trying to figure out which was which was the difficult part, I guess.

sounds like our president elect?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

sounds like our president elect?

consider this a warning concerning talking politics...thanks

[mark evans]

Originally Posted by Leon

consider this a warning concerning talking politics...thanks

If kosher, would it be permissible to seek recommendations of non-partisan political blogs. I would enjoy discussing some issues in a board that shares characteristics with this one. Bright, educated comments, with name shown, no trolls or ad hominem attacks. If ok by Leon, maybe some of you who also talk politics on non-partisan boards could give me a lead (privately if necessary).

If I can stray further O-T: Go Tide. My college roommate (1966) was from Selma, Alabama. Being a native of Virginia myself, I found it more enjoyable to root for the Tide. Been a fun ride for 50 years.

[Rich Klein]

More important than if the web site is still operational is Mr. Nash has not written anything since June. To me, that is more a clue of his moribund status than just re-upping for the website.

Regards
Rich

[Brian Van Horn]

Honorable John M. Galasso. Gotta wonder if he is any relation to Renata.

[brianp-beme]

Tried the link as seen in the OP and the website comes up for me as well. Perhaps the OP originally tried 'haul' instead of 'hauls' when entering in the website address.

Brian

[sports-rings]

Originally Posted by brianp-beme

Tried the link as seen in the OP and the website comes up for me as well. Perhaps the OP originally tried 'haul' instead of 'hauls' when entering in the website address.

Brian

I used a fixed link to visit this site so a typing error was not possible.

Sure enough the site was switched this morning, but now it's back to Peter's control again.

Perhaps he was able to pay his bill and have it redirected. I assure you, this morning it was taken over by another company.

[ibuysportsephemera]

Maybe he read here that his site ownership had lapsed?

Jeff

[PhillipAbbott79]

Domain providers provide a large window for domain reclamation. Just because it expires doesn't mean you lost it. You can contact your registrar and typically they will give you a 45 day window which you can simply renew it at normal cost, but even if the name goes back to ICAN, you can pay a reclamation fee to have it returned back to you, within a longer window, perhaps a total of 90 days or up until the name is officially released.

In that time frame the registrar typically puts up things on your domain to harvest money from your existing traffic.

It looks like the registration is on 1/7 so likely expired, and then renewed, and typically it take 24 to 48 hours for the site DNS to be put back to your web content rather than the registrars advertisement.

Hope that clears it up.

[ruth-gehrig]

From his main page:

"The services of Hauls of Shame and Peter J. Nash as a consultant and expert are available to collectors, auction houses, institutions, legal representatives and law enforcement.**
To inquire about details contact us at:info@haulsofshame.com"

How could law enforcement possibly take him seriously as an expert or consultant??

[oldrighty35]

Slightly better than the 2/3 untrue of the soon to be former prez.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by oldrighty35

Slightly better than the 2/3 untrue of the soon to be former prez.

better be careful! poltical commentary may land u in net54 purgatory!

[Sean]

Originally Posted by oldrighty35

Slightly better than the 2/3 untrue of the soon to be former prez.

Hi, new member. A couple points:

1- You're post is unintelligible;
2- I'm confident that if I could understand it, I would disagree with you;
3- No politics are discussed on this board; and
4- We're serious about that rule that if you give an opinion about someone, your full name must be included in your post.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Sean

Hi, new member. A couple points:

1- You're post is unintelligible;
2- I'm confident that if I could understand it, I would disagree with you;
3- No politics are discussed on this board; and
4- We're serious about that rule that if you give an opinion about someone, you're full name must be included in your post.

+1

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by Sean

Hi, new member. A couple points:

1- You're post is unintelligible;
2- I'm confident that if I could understand it, I would disagree with you;
3- No politics are discussed on this board; and
4- We're serious about that rule that if you give an opinion about someone, you're full name must be included in your post.

That's funny. When that Ullman guy made a d-bag comment about Trump in this thread, you said absolutely nothing!!! But here someone goes against your hero and suddenly you're outraged???????????

[Sean]

I wasn't outraged, but I did disagree. But "that Ullman guy" put his name on his post, and he was admonished by Leon for discussing politics. This gentleman ignored Leon's warning about politics and left his name off his comment.

But yes, I admit that I am an Obama supporter.

[Leon]

We really should leave politics off the board, guys. Believe me, I like to talk politics too!! And if anyone gives an opinion or gets into any debate, their name (scrambled) might be put under their user id per the rules..... Forewarned is fair-warned. Thanks for everyone's adherence. If there are any questions please post them here.

[Huysmans]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

That's funny. When that Ullman guy made a d-bag comment about Trump in this thread, you said absolutely nothing!!! But here someone goes against your hero and suddenly you're outraged???????????

+1

..... and why no talk about Kid 'n Play on this thread when discussing Hip-Hop greats? ��

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Huysmans

+1

..... and why no talk about Kid 'n Play on this thread when discussing Hip-Hop greats? ��

Ya...my truthful comment was so douchey! You oversensitive souls should go back to your 60's topps cards.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

You oversensitive souls should go back to your 60's topps cards.

If you like your 1969 Reggie Jackson rookie, you can keep your 1969 Reggie Jackson rookie. The post war collector can expect an average savings of $2,500 next year on their set building. If I had a son, he would look like Don Mossi.
It's above my pay grade to ever try to tackle the Monster. If they bring a 1963 Pete Rose PSA 9, you bring a T206 Magie. All 60's Topps collectors must have skin in the game. EBay acted stupidly when they found in favor of the seller that sold me a trimmed 1967 Tom Seaver. It was a spontaneous protest caused by an offensive Internet video made by the despicable seller Battlefield6606 that showed them photo shopping a 1968 Johnny Bench with creases and stains. Now begins the fundamental transformation of the Net54 post war section. There is not a smidgen of evidence that any fraud was committed from the shilling of the 1968 Nolan Ryan. I have now been to 57 of the remaining brick and mortar stores that still carry vintage 60's Topps, I have one more to go to.

[ksabet]

Originally Posted by Huysmans

+1

..... and why no talk about Kid 'n Play on this thread when discussing Hip-Hop greats? ��

I think you answered your own question