![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't really see how there can be a multiplier that can be applied across all sets. Even in postwar, there's a lot of variation. Callahans were sold as sets and the most common grade is an 8, so a seven should be a bit cheaper than normal. 1950 Drakes are pretty tough in anything over a 6.
Individual cards within a set can be harder to find in nice condition too, so I might pay more for those in a lower grade. In prewar, the same stuff happens. There's a few T206 commons I've bought for more than the grade would seem to deserve because the front/series combination isn't common. Some sets I'd be very happy to find any card at a price I could afford. What I do is make a rough comparison to recent sales on Ebay. That sort of gives me the going rate for a particular card or typical common. Steve B |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CBC News story comparing Canadian home prices to baseball cards valuations | byrone | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-15-2015 03:29 PM |
t206.org valuations? | camlov2 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-07-2012 03:35 PM |
Help With T205 Valuations | KODIAK | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-20-2012 12:29 PM |
The percentages finally caught up with me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-18-2005 02:48 PM |