![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Maybe the photo was taken on Ash Wednesday |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What church do you attend Thomas that red dots people on Ash Wednesday
![]() Irv-- the Topps cards prior to 57 were not colored photographs but rather black and white photos that were later colorized, and if you check his other cards from other years on eBay, they do not show red. BUT he does seem to have a growth there. I think you can find his 52 with no red Last edited by ALR-bishop; 07-01-2016 at 11:05 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I wasn't aware of that. I haven't come across a 52 (yet) without the red dot so I was assuming these cards were one offs and not double printed?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The right version has a red line at the bottom. It does not appear to be a miscut as there is white under the red line.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those lines show up on just about every Topps set. Not always on every card. I believe they're marks to help the people running the cutter. So they'd probably have dropped them when they went with more automated cutters.
1970 Topps I'm pretty sure every card comes with a line or without. And there are different lines on some cards. Steve B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree that the 70 set and many others can be found with lines at top or bottom of cards. Often gray or black, and they can extend all across card or be partial. This red mark looks a little different to me, maybe just errant ink,... or maybe it is a partial line
Tom---do you know if it is recurring ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I will have to check my other cards more carefully as I wasn't aware any of my cards had this mark.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good follow up Dale
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No problem, Al.
I quickly looked the cards that were in the same stack as my, Boyer, (same series range) and didn't notice any others. I will, time permitting, look at my others later to see if I have some other anomalies that I didn't originally notice?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-Topps-2...8AAOSwyDxXgNng |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even more interesting is the "price change" Dean's did on this card on 7.7.....less than 2 days after the initial post about this card.....probably just a complete coincidence though.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...p2047675.l2569 FWIW, my copy has the red line also: |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Still curious how these red marks came about on these cards, but I doubt we'll ever know?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Masi is recurring, printer's mark ?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |