Show...me...your print variations!

[ALR-bishop]

Sometimes the 67s are really green



Been out of the country for a bit. Did the 1960 Aaron with the defective insert posted here sell ?

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Been out of the country for a bit. Did the 1960 Aaron with the defective insert posted here sell ?

The listing ended unsold on May 16. At that price, that baby isn't selling until YOU buy it .

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Sometimes the 67s are really green



Been out of the country for a bit. Did the 1960 Aaron with the defective insert posted here sell ?

Al, those would look super cool with the parts that are supposed to be missing the green turned yellow.

Here is a nice print offset card I recently picked up. Really like the second set of eyes on Robertson.

1996 Upper Deck #200 Mark on pants leg, just noticed it

[savedfrommyspokes]

Found a limited recurring yellow square near the lower right hand corner of this card....

[ALR-bishop]

Unfortunately when locating one of them on ebay I also ran across one where the box is rectangular rather than square, so had to buy it too . This thread has cost me quite a bit of money over time

[Sliphorn]

Notice the yellow boomerang on his right nostril in the lower version. There are at least two on eBay right now.

[ALR-bishop]

Thomas---I have two Millers in my set. One is the version where there is not any green on the back, including the green box lines around the stats. This is a scarce but recurring print defect. My no green version has the front nose triangle. Does yours have that no green back, or can the triangle be found on regular backs as well

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Been out of the country for a bit. Did the 1960 Aaron with the defective insert posted here sell ?

Uh oh, someone just bought it for $500 yesterday.

[irv]

I think I posted this before but I am still wondering if this is a print defect?
All the cards I looked at also have this red dot on his forehead so I am curious if this is a printing defect or is there a chance Billy had this mole/mark on his forehead? (It's pretty red so doubt it but don't want to be insensitive it is is?)

http://www.vintagecardprices.com/car...lue-Prices.htm

https://www.google.ca/search?q=billy...sAQIJw&dpr=1.5

[Sliphorn]

Originally Posted by irv

I think I posted this before but I am still wondering if this is a print defect?
All the cards I looked at also have this red dot on his forehead so I am curious if this is a printing defect or is there a chance Billy had this mole/mark on his forehead? (It's pretty red so doubt it but don't want to be insensitive it is is?)

http://www.vintagecardprices.com/car...lue-Prices.htm

https://www.google.ca/search?q=billy...sAQIJw&dpr=1.5

Maybe the photo was taken on Ash Wednesday

[ALR-bishop]

What church do you attend Thomas that red dots people on Ash Wednesday

Irv-- the Topps cards prior to 57 were not colored photographs but rather black and white photos that were later colorized, and if you check his other cards from other years on eBay, they do not show red. BUT he does seem to have a growth there. I think you can find his 52 with no red

[irv]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

What church do you attend Thomas that red dots people on Ash Wednesday

Irv-- the Topps cards prior to 57 were not colored photographs but rather black and white photos that were later colorized, and if you check his other cards from other years on eBay, they do not show red. BUT he does seem to have a growth there. I think you can find his 52 with no red

Thanks, Al.

I wasn't aware of that.

I haven't come across a 52 (yet) without the red dot so I was assuming these cards were one offs and not double printed?

[Sliphorn]

The right version has a red line at the bottom. It does not appear to be a miscut as there is white under the red line.