 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
06-29-2016, 10:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Every PSA 7, 8, 9 and 10 card.
I have no idea why buyers have allowed themselves to be duped by the sellers/dealers (who have a vested interest) into believing pristine looking cards are worth more money. Either you have a 52 Mantle or you don't. It's a binary event. Having the "best looking 52 Mantle" (whatever that means to 2,000 different people) shouldn't command a premium of many multiples - if the market behaved rationally. No one here would pay $10,000 for a "better" sandwich than the one that cost $15. Yet folks willingly over pay this for cardboard every single day. But I'm glad all these people buy all these overpriced cards - because if they didn't, I wouldn't be able to have a collection in the first place. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lowest Valued Rarities? | ksabet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-28-2014 08:58 PM |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 11:54 AM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 04:12 PM |
| D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 03:33 PM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 11:13 AM |
Threaded Mode