Iconic Player?

[brian1961]

Lou, let me preface my remarks by saying I cannot answer all you're asking. However, in regard to why some players are able to achieve this distinction, and are viewed in that respect, there are a few key ingredients that seem to typify that kind of player.

Now, again, I am thinking in terms of a player to a city, not so much nationwide.

He seems to be someone with the same club for 8-10 years, or more.

He seems to achieve strong stats, leading his team, and is often at the top, or near the top, of the league leaders.

In clutch situations, he seems to come through the majority of the time.

He seems to be quiet, and yet affable to the press. The camera likes him, a phrase I got from the immortal directer, John Huston. Thus, he seems to give decent interviews for the papers, and proves even better in front of the camera. Athletes, when you boil it all away, are indeed entertainers. So, the combination of sport performance, especially when you "rise to the occasion", being a good interview, and finally, if you are genuinely friendly and wholesome with your fans. Of the latter, hockey players used to be among the very best with their fans. The legendary Maurice Richard, the recently deceased Gordie Howe, and Bobby Hull were adored by their legions of fans, and the feelings of love and respect were reciprocated by these three gentlemen right back to their fans. Their fan-hero relationship was priceless.

Some athletes believe the only thing they owe the fans is their best performance, and then leave me alone. I do not want to be bothered by you. Get away from me---you make me nervous. Whatever. In time, they've assassinated or bludgeoned enough of their fans emotionally, that people look at them at best as a mixed bag.

When Rocket Richard died, all Montreal went into mourning. I suspect the same will happen in Detroit with Gordie Howe's passing. Or when the time comes that Al Kaline leaves us. I sure felt that when Ernie Banks passed away, as he was my hero growing up in the suburbs of Chicago in the 60s.

I wasn't from New York, but it hurt when Mickey Mantle passed away. I was in anguish.

Summarizing, you gotta be good, be good in the clutch, and be friendly with the press and with your fans. They make you.

Or else, they wad you up like a piece of waste paper and spit on you if you ignore them, are mean to them, or hurt them or their child!

Just my nickel pack's worth. ---Brian Powell

[David W]

You can be " iconic" but not great - Joe Carter, Bill Mazeroski, Kirk Gibson.

You can be "iconic" for a brief time and then have a better post career legend - Gale Sayers Bo Jackson, Jimmy Hendrix.

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unit as.

[CxG Seven Dust]

Jeter comes to mind as "iconic" imo. Durability, team he played for, clutch, etc...

[packs]

To me an iconic player is someone who embodies their sport. An icon is usually specific to a generation or a location. For example, Ichiro is undoubtedly an icon in Japan. I wouldn't say he's an icon in America though. The current American baseball icon as a whole (in my opinion) is Derek Jeter.

What makes them icons? I would say it is usually a mix of talent, opportunity, playing for the right team / at the right time, and exemplifying something more than just a baseball player. For Ichiro it would be because he is a pioneer. For Jeter it was that he demonstrated unparalleled class and endurance while playing the most high profile position for the most high profile team during the most high profile dynasty in sports at the time.

[ALR-bishop]

If you originated in St Louis like I did, Stan Musial was and remains iconic, as opposed to other fine players who were there, like Gibson, Brock and Ozzie Smith.

[KCRfan1]

Al,

So what makes Musical iconic, and why aren't Gibson, Brock, and Smith viewed as such?

[clydepepper]

I believe that the 'most iconic player ever' based on his effect on and continued status in the hobby is Mickey Mantle.

Besides being a great player, his career occurred as the Television Age exploded and he played for the best known team from the largest city.

IMHO, he is the gold standard...even Ruth lags behind.




.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by David W

You can be " iconic" but not great - Joe Carter, Bill Mazeroski, Kirk Gibson.

You can be "iconic" for a brief time and then have a better post career legend - Gale Sayers Bo Jackson, Jimmy Hendrix.

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unit as.

One mistake, I'll fix it for you.

You can be " iconic" but not great - Joe Carter, Bill Mazeroski, Kirk Gibson.

You can be "iconic" for a brief time and then have a better post career legend - Gale Sayers Bo Jackson .

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unitas, Jimmy Hendrix.


Steve B

[steve B]

On a more serious note, I think it's mostly about someone who might immediately come to mind to a casual fan. Usually by being part of or better still the main player in one of an eras defining moments.

Too hard to compare Ruth to Mantle. I'll just say that in the 20's Ruth was the larger than life character that made people forget how crooked the game was before Landis. (And that's a debate for another thread entirely !)

I don't really see Mantle that way, but for a generation of NY fans he was THE player.
But then, I didn't see him play only getting interested in baseball in 73. So for me it was other players. Aaron especially.

And of course Reggie in the 70's for both Oakland and NY

A great example for the 80's would be Kirk Gibson. One amazing moment that really represents the best of 80's baseball.

Being press friendly doesn't hurt a bit of course.
Jim Rice was amazing for a number of years, but seldom got into the special games. And while he had reason to feel slighted by the press, his general unresponsiveness didn't help things.

I never really liked the hype, but yeah, Jeter has to be up there for the last couple decades. Didn't like the "best player ever" stuff, and he played for NY. but he was hard to really dislike even as a sox fan. I admired him all the more when I heard an interview where he was asked about the Fenway fans getting on him. Great response! Something like "I actually like it, Boston and NY have fans that really know baseball, and they don't get on the average guys like that. So it's sort of an honor, and one that pushes me to play harder against them." Gotta like that a whole lot.

Steve B

[MCoxon]

Iconic is a moving target. There was a time that if you made it to the cover of Life, you had transcended your vocation. But even those who made Life Magazine covers while playing don't necessarily remain popular forever.

Ted Williams, Carl Yastrzemski, Nolan Ryan. Each seem to have fallen out of favor with baseball card collectors recently, but were extremely iconic in their time and place (ie, in Boston, and nationally in the late 80s/90s for Ryan). Williams and Yaz both were on the cover of Life.

Joe DiMaggio was probably more iconic in his time in terms of transcending sports into the national culture than several others mentioned in these posts. Two Life covers. Even after he finished playing, he was still in the national consciousness (married to Marilyn Monroe; Mr. Coffee commercials; being named in the song Mrs. Robinson; heck, on Seinfeld). But he doesn't have any topps cards (or goudey for that matter), so from a card collector's stand point not as much anymore

Bob Feller was a national phenomenon and icon. He pitched in MLB at 17 while still in high school. His high school graduation was broadcast by CBS. He was on the cover of Life. He was a top 3 MLB draw in the late 30's and 40's along with Williams and DiMaggio. But in a stats-obsessed age, 266 wins (less 4 years of 25 wins each lost to WWII - which he signed up for first among ball players) doesn't cut it, and he's forgotten except in Cleveland.

More modern fan favorites weren't necessarily iconic until later, sometimes late in or even after their career.

Clemente became iconic after the 1971 World Series (when people finally paid attention) and of course after Dec 31, 1972; he was relatively unknown to the non-NL baseball fan, let alone to the broader national consciousness, before that. (he's my favorite player, I'm not dissing him)

[7nohitter]

Originally Posted by MCoxon

Iconic is a moving target. There was a time that if you made it to the cover of Life, you had transcended your vocation. But even those who made Life Magazine covers while playing don't necessarily remain popular forever.

Ted Williams, Carl Yastrzemski, Nolan Ryan. Each seem to have fallen out of favor with baseball card collectors recently, but were extremely iconic in their time and place (ie, in Boston, and nationally in the late 80s/90s for Ryan). Williams and Yaz both were on the cover of Life.

Fallen out of favor??? What makes you say that?

[Johnny630]

Cal Ripken Jr. Baltimore

[MCoxon]

Originally Posted by 7nohitter

Fallen out of favor??? What makes you say that?

Just my sense

1) no one on the thread mentioned those 3.

2) Ryan. When I was younger in the 80s/90s Ryan was very iconic; several of his cards (except rookie) seem to be declining in value

3) Yaz. I wrote a thread earlier. In the late 80s just after he retired, per Contemporary Beckett guides, his card prices were on par with Koufax and Aaron, and his 1971 card was valued higher than all but 2-3. Now, his cards are worth relatively a lot less

4). Williams. I have bought several cards under SMR Lately. He doesn't have the cache, at least on these boards, relative to his heyday.

My Two Cents

Definition of iconic
a : widely recognized and well-established
b : widely known and acknowledged especially for distinctive excellence

PETE ROSE

Iconic ? 19th Century , Pre War, Post War and Modern, and even further Regular Season vs Playoffs and World Series

[7nohitter]

David Ortiz-Boston

Rusty Staub-Montreal

Mike Sweeney-Kansas City

Mookie Wilson (though I'm loathe to admit it) NY

Tony Conigliaro - Boston

Jeff Burroughs - Texas

Sid Bream - Atlanta

[KCRfan1]

Originally Posted by 7nohitter

David Ortiz-Boston

Rusty Staub-Montreal

Mike Sweeney-Kansas City

Mookie Wilson (though I'm loathe to admit it) NY

Tony Conigliaro - Boston

Jeff Burroughs - Texas

Sid Bream - Atlanta

I live in KC, and Sweeney is FAR from iconic here. George Brett is, but certainly Sweeney is not. Fine player, but definitely not iconic.

[the 'stache]

Originally Posted by steve B

One mistake, I'll fix it for you.

You can be " iconic" but not great - Joe Carter, Bill Mazeroski, Kirk Gibson.

You can be "iconic" for a brief time and then have a better post career legend - Gale Sayers Bo Jackson .

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unitas, Jimmy Hendrix.


Steve B

One mistake, I'll fix it for you.

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unitas, Jimi Hendrix.

[steve B]

Originally Posted by the 'stache

One mistake, I'll fix it for you.

Or you can be "iconic" by being in the discussion about best ever - Babe Ruth, Michael Jordan, John Unitas, Jimi Hendrix.

Darn! Burned by copy and paste laziness.

I'll listen to a few tracks tonight as penance

Steve B

[bravos4evr]

I tend to think that to reach "icon" status, you need to be great, charismatic,(being fan friendly helps) BUT,THE BIGGEST THING, is to stay on one team for a looong time.

If Chipper Jones had left in free agency to the Blue Jays he would have still been a great player but he wouldn't have been an icon like he was due to staying in ATL his whole career.

edit: and to add, the media helps, Jeter was treated like he was a top ten all time player, if he had played for the Twins we'd remember him in a similar vein as Barry Larkin. Great, icon of his team, but not this elite player of all time like the media treated him.

[tedzan]

The term "iconic" nowadays is an overused, and many times misplaced adjective to describe a celebrity, sports figure, etc. Whatever. The following certainly applies.......

Being fortunate (and old enough) to have seen lots of baseball games from 1949 - 1960, in my book Mickey Mantle and Jackie Robinson are the 1950's guys. And this is
how I gauge this......if you were busy at whatever in your everyday activities, and you were near a TV or radio, you stopped everything when you knew Jackie or Mickey
were at bat and your undivided attention was with them.

In the 1920's, it would have been Babe Ruth.

In the 1930's and the 1940's, Joe DiMaggio.

Also, in the 1940's, Ted Williams and Stan Musial.

In the 1960's, Sandy Koufax.

In the 1970's, Reggie Jackson and Pete Rose.


TED Z
.

[KCRfan1]

Hard to top those guys Ted!

So is there anyone from the 80's we can view as iconic? Ripken? 90's? Or 00's? Jeter?

10's? Harper or Trout?

There are some terrific players in the game now, but none seem to be iconic.

Has the scope of traditional media and social media muddied the term iconic? There certainly isn't any mystery with the players. I don't see the allure of todays player on par with those of the past.

Am I missing something?