![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget! ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The point I was going to make is, how can you detect counterfeit bills, but PSA can't detect counterfeit cards? Edited to add: And one last question and I think I will have proven my point. Would you ever deem a bill as "questionable authenticity" or would you categorically say it's either real or it's not? Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 04-28-2016 at 11:37 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
PSA is not in the business of detecting fakes. They are in the business of authenticating real ones. So far you have called me wrong, mocked my profession and accused me of "not getting it" Try to be a little more civil. I am not calling you wrong, I am telling you I disagree with you and I understand why PSA is doing it that way.
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget! ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And yes, you were wrong. You inferred that PSA didn't make any money be determining a card as questionable authenticity. They still charge to grade the card whether it is deemed to be real or not. I've been civil with you. Now, you're just being ridiculous. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i cant even tell who's on first anymore...
(reminds me of the snl skit w/ will ferrell playing harry carray and comparing nickels to hotdogs, depending on the strength of the yen) . Last edited by begsu1013; 04-28-2016 at 11:57 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget! ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From PSA website
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget! ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mic drop, indeed. Case closed. Pretty sad grown men took time from their days to argue over such trivial crap. The internet is a cesspool.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You are ridiculous to believe that any corporation or company is going to take on added liability to establish something as an outright fake when they don't have to. You are also wrong to assume that people pay money to PSA to tell them if a card is fake. They pay them to tell them that if its real and if its not in the opinion of PSA, they tell them that they won't grade it because they question its authenticity. You don't like the fact that PSA doesn't state in black and white that "Its a fake and you are stupid for sending it to us" You aren't being civil don't kid yourself. We are talking about something so arbitrary as the wording on a sticker that PSA attaches to a fake card. The whole world is filled with "they oughta's". Our opinions of their policy and business model has no effect on their bottom line. I would wager that some attorney somewhere told them to word it exactly that way as to not take on unneeded liability.
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget! ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Honus Wagner... real or fake ?? | Qcards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-28-2012 09:42 PM |
This Looks Like Those Guys' Card Who Have the Fake T206 Wagner | Brian-Chidester | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-07-2011 06:20 PM |
Yet another fake T206 Wagner out there... | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-24-2010 11:16 AM |
Another week, another fake T206 Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 07-25-2007 09:52 PM |
T206 Wagner Fake alert | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 07-29-2002 10:18 AM |