![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A poor condition Ruth may sell in the $1200 range if it presents well. I have been watching the 181 over the last several months and poor copies routinely break $1K, but they look great for the grade. I don't know how well that version sells because I am not interested in it, but although I don't doubt someone would pay $100 for one that bad, I am not sure why. Isn't one of the allures of a baseball card the appearance? I suppose filling a hole for a set is one reason, but jeez...
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My comment was made somewhat in jest as reprints routinely sell for a few hundred $.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are different levels of PSA 1's. That being said, this card won't 1. It would set record low for "authentic" if it is real.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I trust the dealer I got it from 15 years ago.
PSA 0 goes for $1200 with 25 watching. I will send to grading one day will show a lot nicer . I have examined with my goudey cards and 100%. $100? more like $750 but again not selling happy easter |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
750 sounds pretty high to me in an authentic holder. 200-300 would be my guess. There is too much paper loss on the front for much more than that.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you could get 200-300$ I'd take it and never look back.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, how much for this authentic Ruth? It is obviously missing huge chunks and is actually in two pieces, but in my opinion it displays a lot nicer than the one posted. We all had a nice laugh when I have posted this in the past...it is not all about the money.
As a side question, I wonder how much someone would pay for my Diamond Stars Hornsby with the blank front? Brian |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed!! I was thinking $40 was too much!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is staggeringly dumb.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's a little harsh. If there is enough of the card left to grade I would send it in. I'm sure it's worth more graded as raw there is more of a question of authenticity.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please. If you put garbage in a holder, it doesn't "show nicer" and it isn't "worth more".
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am really confused. You know this card is authentic, and you know what the card is worth. What would you like an opinion on?
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
all cards presented are nicer and more valuable than that of the op. just because the op purchased a likely authentic beat to piss goudey ruth years ago for likely a song...the op shouldn't take it as an insult...unless he purposely made the card this way...that this card is not very valuable.
it is what it is. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The guy who owns the $25 card in question here, and the guy that bought the $650 Ruth card with back damage on Ebay (2 threads above).........should get together and put BOTH cards in a holder back to back. Nice front, nice back. Problem solved! You're welcome....
Last edited by Bpm0014; 03-28-2016 at 07:12 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1933 Goudey Ruth #53 - Poor/Fair Graded | 25801wv | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-05-2015 06:48 PM |
WTB Poor Grade 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth | g&m sales | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-13-2014 12:36 PM |
FS: 33 Goudey Ruth and 34 Goudey Gehrig in poor condition | sylbry | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-22-2014 11:56 AM |
WBT-TTTF 1933 Goudey #144 Babe Ruth Poor- scans of trade bait included | frankh8147 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-12-2013 11:56 AM |
Napoleon (Larry) Lajoie 1933 Goudey POOR (not ruth) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-29-2004 08:18 AM |