![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As Darren and others pointed out in an earlier thread, it gets complicated when a player has multiple cards designated as rookie cards. Bill Davis had 5 multiple player rookie cards, but no stand alone cards. Piniella has 3 multiple player rookie cards. Cey and Murphy had more than one, and Gaylord Perry had a stand alone card in 62 and then a "rookie card" in 63
I vote for Rose as the best 2nd year improvement |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suggestions for some visually appealing non-RC HoF | ThePumaLives | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 01-07-2016 06:37 AM |
Griffey Rookie Year Signature | Luke | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 03-11-2015 12:18 AM |
Rookie of the Year Projections | Runscott | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 9 | 09-04-2014 09:40 AM |
Monster aficionados, which 5 cards from the set do you find most visually appealing? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 09-14-2013 06:11 AM |
Most visually appealing sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 06-23-2005 09:22 AM |